Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

We Are the 2%!

By Robert C. Solomon, M.D. | on February 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

False beliefs abound. In few areas of public discussion is this more true than health policy.

You Might Also Like
  • Beyond the Mandate: Why ObamaCare Matters
  • Front Row Seat to the Bonfire
  • Be Like The Netherlands?
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 02 – February 2012

One of these false beliefs is that emergency care is terribly expensive, and that we could save a lot of money if we could just somehow see to it that everyone who goes to a hospital emergency department with a problem that is not a true emergency could be re-directed somewhere else.

So … is that true or false?

As with so many other things, it depends on how you look at it. And, with a complex proposition such as this one, it is important to recognize that it has several interdependent parts.

If you’ve been a patient in a hospital emergency department (ED) for something that you might have seen your primary care doctor about, if you could get a timely appointment, you surely noticed that the bill was higher than it would have been at the doctor’s office. There are, as you may know, two fundamental reasons for that.

First is that the ED has a lot more “fixed costs” (or overhead) that must be covered by revenues. Second is that we have to engage in “cost shifting.” We have a lot of patients who do not or cannot pay. So the hospital must bill paying customers more to make up for the ones who pay little or nothing.

Imagine going to McDonald’s and finding that the price of a Big Mac had doubled because half of Mickey D’s customers weren’t paying for their meals, and so the paying customers had to pick up the tab. … That doesn’t happen at McDonald’s, because they don’t give everybody chicken nuggets regardless of ability to pay. In the ED, we do exactly that. We do it partly because we believe in certain principles of social justice and partly because there is a federal statute that says we must.

So the cost is higher after accounting for overhead, and the price difference is even bigger. And if you have private insurance, the insurance company has ways of discouraging you from using the ED when you could go to your doctor’s office instead. For example, if you were sick, but not sick enough to be hospitalized, your ED co-pay might be $100, whereas in the office it would have been $10. And yet people go to the ED anyway. There are lots of reasons for that: convenience, resources available in the ED, and perceptions of the quality and comprehensiveness of care are perhaps foremost among them.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: BloggEDCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth Care ReformPoliticsPublic Policy

Related

  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “We Are the 2%!”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603