Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Need for CT May Be Missed in Patients Presenting Late After Head Injury

By Anne Harding (Reuters Health) | on June 8, 2016 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Current guidelines for using computed tomography (CT) in patients with head injury should be applied cautiously in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) more than 24 hours post-injury, new findings suggest.

You Might Also Like
  • Consider Optic Nerve Head Edema in Some ED Patients
  • Critical Issues in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department in Early Pregnancy
  • Delirium in the Elderly: A Diagnosis Often Missed

“This is a group of patients in which such guidelines were not derived and validated,” Dr. Carl Marincowitz of Hull Royal Infirmary in Hull, UK, told Reuters Health by email. “The study that we have completed shows that although predictive of injuries, the sole use of such guidelines in patients presenting after 24 hours of injury would lead to significant injuries not being identified.”

Five percent of patients who present to the ED with head injury are admitted to the hospital, while 1% require neurosurgical intervention, the researchers noted in an article online in Emergency Medicine Journal.

Clinical decision rules aim to distinguish between patients with mild to minor head injuries who can be discharged based on clinical history and examination, and those who require CT scanning to rule out significant pathology. However, the researchers added, the widely used Canadian CT Head Rule was derived from and validated in patients who presented within 24 hours of injury. It has been unclear whether patients who present later are at higher or lower risk of significant injury.

To investigate, the researchers reviewed CT scans for 650 adult head trauma patients, including 101 (15.5%) who presented after 24 hours. Nearly 9% of the CT scans showed significant traumatic abnormality, and the percentage was similar for patients presenting within and after 24 hours. The likelihood of requiring neurosurgery was 0.9% for the patients presenting within 24 hours and 3% for those presenting later, although this was not a statistically significant difference. There was no guideline indication for CT scanning in 13.7% of those presenting within 24 hours of injury and 38.6% of those presenting after that period, however.

In patients who presented within 24 hours, the sensitivity of the guidelines for identifying an indication for CT scan was 97.8% in patients with traumatic intracranial findings and 100% in patients with neurosurgical outcomes or death. But the sensitivity fell to 70% and 75%, respectively, for patients presenting later.

The findings suggest, the investigators stated, that patients presenting after 24 hours for head trauma are not a lower-risk group.

Guidelines should acknowledge which populations they are, and are not, applicable to, Dr. Marincowitz told Reuters Health. “Any head injury guidelines based upon the Canadian CT head rule should acknowledge that patients presenting after 24 hours of injury should be treated cautiously until further research about this group has been conducted to assess which risk factors predict significant injuries in this group,” the researcher said.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalCT ScanEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency Physicianhead injuryOutcomePatient Care

Related

  • Case Report: When Syncope Gets Hairy

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection with POCUS

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • New Clinical Policy for Adult Patients with Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

    May 7, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Need for CT May Be Missed in Patients Presenting Late After Head Injury”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603