Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

What Is—and Isn’t—Guaranteed Under EMTALA Can Be Complex

By Eric Funk, MD | on December 15, 2020 | 0 Comment
Medicolegal Mind
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

This medical malpractice case is high yield for every emergency physician as it covers a subtle but life-threatening diagnosis and highlights the importance of communication at multiple levels. It also provides an opportunity for us to better understand the nuances of EMTALA-related litigation.

You Might Also Like
  • Is “Severe Pain” considered an emergency medical condition under EMTALA?
  • Whose EMTALA Is It, Anyway?
  • EMTALA: The Law That Forever Changed the Practice of EM
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 12 – December 2020

The Case

A 30-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of weakness and ankle pain. He was seen in an outpatient clinic and referred to the emergency department for evaluation. The patient had recently returned from a surfing trip to Asia. While on the trip, he reported being bitten by mosquitos multiple times but had not taken any malaria prophylaxis. He also had jumped out of a truck the day before and had twisted his left ankle.

The review of systems was positive for fever, vomiting, myalgias, and headaches.

He was otherwise healthy and up-to-date on his vaccinations.

Figure 1

Figure 1

His triage vitals showed a temperature of 99.5ºF, heart rate of 85 bpm, blood pressure of 118/56, respirations of 20 per minute, and oxygen saturation of 97 percent on room air (see Figure 1).

A boilerplate normal examination was documented, including a musculoskeletal note describing “no edema and no tenderness.”

The physician noted a differential of “viral syndrome, otitis media, pharyngitis, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infection, and others.”

A complete blood count (CBC) was ordered and showed leukocytosis of 14.9, thrombocytopenia of 132. The differential showed 87 percent neutrophils and 5 percent lymphocytes. The comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) was entirely unremarkable. The urinalysis showed a large amount of blood and occasional bacteria but no white blood cells, leukocyte esterase, or nitrites. An influenza swab was negative, and a malaria smear was also negative (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2

An ankle X-ray was ordered and showed “moderate soft tissue swelling” but no fracture or dislocation.

A repeat set of vitals was ordered, and everything was in the normal ranges.

Given the lack of emergency findings and normal vitals, the patient was discharged home. The doctor recommended he take Tylenol or ibuprofen, stay hydrated, and rest. Crutches were provided, and instructions were given to keep the left ankle elevated. A plan to follow up with urgent care the following week for reassessment was recommended.

Commentary

Everything about this case seems straightforward to this point. There is nothing that can be reasonably criticized. The workup is negative. 

But this is a medical malpractice column. There has to be a twist.

Recall that the patient was seen in an outpatient clinic and referred to the emergency department. The ED physician was unaware of this. The patient did not volunteer this information, there were no triage notes mentioning it, and no one asked the patient about the preceding medical care.

Shortly before ED arrival, the outpatient clinic documented a blood pressure of 81/38 and a temperature of 100.2ºF.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Case ReportsEMTALAMalpracticeNecrotizing Fasciitis

Related

  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Two Cases of Female Patients with Peritonitis

    April 23, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “What Is—and Isn’t—Guaranteed Under EMTALA Can Be Complex”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603