Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Updates in the Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

By Matthew Carvey, MD; and Jonathan Glauser, MD, MBA, FACEP | on June 12, 2024 | 1 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

4. Antibiotics

You Might Also Like
  • Vitamin C Not a Magical Cure for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
  • Sepsis and Septic Shock Get New International Consensus Definitions
  • Opinion: How the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Got Almost Everything Wrong
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 06 – June 2024

Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens in the acute stages of severe sepsis and septic shock are becoming a mainstay of treatment. The SSC guidelines base antimicrobial administration recommendations on the following: likelihood of a current infectious process based on clinical examination, suspicion for MRSA or MDR organisms, and viral or fungal sources.7 MRSA nasal swabs, when negative, can eliminate the need for MRSA coverage in sepsis patients.5 There is no current recommendation for a specific antibiotic regimen, but administration of broad-spectrum coverage must be completed within one hour of recognizing septic shock (strong recommendation) or within three hours of recognizing sepsis without shock.5 Each institution will have its own unique microbiome, but, as an example, a suggested antibiotic regimen is presented in tabular form based on Michigan Medicine’s recommendations (Table 2).5 Ferrer and colleagues investigated time to antibiotic administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, concluding that for every hour a physician delays antibiotic coverage, there was a statistically significant increase in mortality.12 Another retrospective cohort study investigated the association between door-to-antibiotic time of patients with clinical sepsis and longterm mortality. Their median door-to-antibiotic time averaged 166 minutes, leading to a one-year mortality risk of 19 percent. Each additional hour delay in antibiotic administration was associated with 10 percent increased odds of one-year mortality.13

Click to enlarge.

In summary, the current recommendations for antibiotic coverage are based on suspicion for an acute bacterial process, and administration of a “broad” antimicrobial regimen is recommended within one hour of recognizing septic shock or within three hours in sepsis without shock.

5. Vasopressors

Current recommendations by the SSC follow a stepwise pattern when considering vasopressor therapy after adequate volume resuscitation. The first recommendation is the use of norepinephrine, followed by vasopressin and then epinephrine if a MAP >65 mmHg cannot be obtained. If there is cardiac dysfunction, one may add dobutamine to supplement norepinephrine or utilize epinephrine alone.7 It is important to mention that both the CENSER and CLOVERS trials investigated standard sepsis management (intravenous fluids followed by vasopressors) versus the early use of norepinephrine. CENSER determined that early norepinephrine use was associated with increased shock control by six hours compared to standard therapy, and CLOVERS concluded that mortality and adverse events were similar between the two groups.11,14 For adults with septic shock on norepinephrine with inadequate MAP levels (<65 mmHg), vasopressin is recommended rather than escalating doses of norepinephrine.5

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalCritical CareGuidelinesInfectious DiseaseSepsis

Related

  • Case Report: When Syncope Gets Hairy

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Discharge Tachycardia: Remember the Big 4 and Don’t Play with Fire

    May 8, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • New Clinical Policy for Adult Patients with Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

    May 7, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

One Response to “Updates in the Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock”

  1. July 1, 2024

    Joseph R Shiber, MD Reply

    Dear ACEPNow Editor,

    Excellent synopsis of ED treatment of septic shock but I would like to add a few clarifications. The preferred balanced IVF is Plasmalyte-A since LR is somewhat hypotonic (Na 130) and uses lactate as a buffer, compared to acetate and gluconate in Plasmalyte-A (Na 140). The additional lactate is not actually detrimental to cellular activity but can hamper the usefulness of tracking lactate levels especially with hepatic or mitochondrial dysfunction where lactate is not being converted back to pyruvate for preparation to enter the TCA cycle. The optimal vasopressor for septic shock should correct the hemodynamic disorder(s) causing the tissue hypoxia. Levophed is certainly the most useful to help restore vascular tone (alpha effect) in the low SVR vasodilatory state of distributive shock while supplying a small B1-2 effect but there are cases where an inappropriate heart-rate response occurs (HR <80) due to medications (such as AVN blockers) or to intrinsic chronotropic failure (age or sepsis related). In these cases, it is paramount to address the heart rate at the same time, since if the heart rate remains inappropriately low while simply increasing SVR the cardiac output and tissue perfusion will potentially go down not up. Lastly, although ECMO is well recognized as a rescue for ARDS (V-V) and circulatory shock (V-A) it should be noted that active bacteremia or fungemia is a contraindication since the circuit will be contaminated immediately and cannot be sterilized.

    Respectfully,
    Joseph Shiber, MD, FACEP, FACP, FNCS, FCCM

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603