Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

U.S. Clinicians Spend More Time with EHR Than Counterparts in Other Countries

By Lisa Rapaport (Reuters Health) | on February 1, 2021 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Compared with counterparts outside the United States, clinicians working in the U.S. spend much more time during the workday, and after hours, engaging with electronic health records (EHR), a new study suggests.

You Might Also Like
  • Health IT Developers’ Pledge to Increase EHR Interoperability Met With Skepticism
  • The Joint Commission Supports Removal of Barriers to Mental Health Care for Clinicians
  • ACEP4U: Update on ACEP’s Electronic Health Record Advocacy Efforts

Researchers examined data on utilization of EHR software from Epic Systems by clinicians at 348 health systems in the U.S. and 23 health systems in Canada, the Middle East, Northern Europe, Oceania, and Western Europe from January through August 2019. Overall, mean daily time spent using ERH was much higher among U.S. clinicians (90.2 minutes) than among peers in other countries (59.1 minutes).

While the study wasn’t designed to determine the reason for this time discrepancy, it’s likely that a number of differences between health systems in the U.S. and other countries influence how EHR get used and how much time clinicians spend with EHR on a daily basis, said lead study author Jay Holmgren, a health policy researcher at Harvard Business School in Boston.

For example, U.S. clinicians do more electronic prescribing than their counterparts elsewhere, time that gets counted as EHR usage in the U.S. but is done on paper in other countries, Holmgren said by email.

“This, and a perception to guard against litigation or malpractice may contribute to defensive documentation that results in longer notes and more EHR time,” Holmgren said.

U.S. clinicians spent more time adding notes to EHRs (mean time 40.7 minutes) than clinicians in other countries (30.7 minutes), Holmgren and his colleagues report in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Clinicians in the U.S. also spent more time entering orders into EHR (mean time 19.5 minutes) than clinicians elsewhere (8.75 minutes).

And clinicians in the U.S. devoted more time responding to in-basket messages via EHR systems (mean time 12.5 minutes) than clinicians in other countries (4.8 minutes).

Clinical review also took more time in EHR in the U.S. (mean time 17.6 minutes) than outside the U.S. (14.8 minutes).

In the U.S., clinicians spent more time using EHR to record notes (77.5 percent of note text vs 60.8 percent elsewhere) and received more in-box messages per day (33.8 vs 12.8 outside the U.S.).

Finally, U.S. clinicians spent more time using EHR during non-working hours (26.5 minutes) than clinicians elsewhere (19.5 minutes).

One limitation of the study is that it only examined usage of a single EHR system. Of the 23 systems outside the U.S. included in the analysis, half (11) were in Western Europe.

Even so, the results suggest that U.S. health systems may need to identify opportunities for clinicians to spend less time with EHRs and more time engaging directly with patients, said Dr. Christine Sinsky, vice president for professional satisfaction at the American Medical Association in Chicago, who wrote a commentary accompanying the study.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: EHRElectronic Health RecordElectronic Medical RecordEMRPractice Management

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “U.S. Clinicians Spend More Time with EHR Than Counterparts in Other Countries”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603