Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Treatment Strategies for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation

By Anton Helman, MD, CCFP(EM), FCFP | on July 10, 2017 | 0 Comment
EM Cases
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

If you have the point-of-care ultrasound skills necessary, a second method to block sympathetic tone is to administer a stellate ganglion block.5 Case studies and one small randomized trial suggest reduced mortality in refractory VF with this method. The stellate ganglion at the level of C7 conducts sympathetic activity to the heart.

You Might Also Like
  • Is Dual-Shock Approach Dangerous to Defibrillators?
  • Understanding Diagnostic Criteria for Anaphylaxis, Anaphylactic Shock, Kounis Syndrome Critical to Initiating Lifesaving Treatment
  • Emergency Interventions for Treating Cardiac Electrical Storms
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 07 – July 2017

Directly blocking sympathetic outflow to the heart may decrease the sensitivity of the myocardium to arrhythmias.6

4. Consider Dual-Shock Defibrillation

If standard defibrillation isn’t working, consider double defibrillation. Animal studies show that most failed shocks are actually successful shocks but that the patient goes back into VF in less than one second. Eighty percent of patients who are resistant to a single shock will respond to dual shock.7 The idea is that you need to depolarize 90 percent of the myocardium to achieve effective defibrillation. If the patient has defibrillator pads in the traditional positions on the chest, attach a second set of pads from a second defibrillator in the anterior-posterior “sandwich” position (see image). At the time of defibrillation, both shock buttons are depressed simultaneously.

Adding a second set of pads changes the energy vectors through the myocardium, which helps achieve that 90 percent threshold. A few small studies have shown promising results for ROSC, with one showing 70 percent conversion with dual shock and 30 percent achieving ROSC in the field.8 It is important to note that the largest study to date on dual defibrillation in refractory VF did not show any benefit for neurologically intact survival.7

Don’t forget that since many patients with shock-resistant VF have an underlying cardiac ischemic event as the primary cause, cardiac arrest experts recommend consulting an interventional cardiologist for consideration of immediate transfer to the cath lab for all VF patients who have achieved ROSC.

Thanks to Jordan Chenkin, Paul Dorian, Laurie Morrison, and Steve Lin for their contributions to the podcasts that inspired this article.


Dr. HelmanDr. Helman is an emergency physician at North York General Hospital in Toronto. He is an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, Division of Emergency Medicine, and the education innovation lead at the Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute. He is the founder and host of Emergency Medicine Cases podcast and website (www.emergencymedicinecases.com).

Resources Online

Episode 71 ACLS Guidelines 2015–Cardiac Arrest Controversies Part 1.

Journal Jam 7–Amiodarone vs Lidocaine vs Placebo in Cardiac Arrest: The ALPS Trial.

References

  1. Tang W, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. Epinephrine increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Circulation. 1995;92(10):3089-3093.
  2. Ristagno G, Tang W, Huang L, et al. Epinephrine reduces cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(4):1408-1415.
  3. Gao D, Sapp JL. Electrical storm: definitions, clinical importance, and treatment. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28(1):72-79.
  4. Driver BE, Debaly G, Plummer DW, et al. Use of esmolol after failure of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation. 2014;85(10):1337-1341.
  5. Gadhinglajkar S, Sreedhar R, Unnikrishnan M, et al. Electrical storm: role of stellate ganglion blockade and anesthetic implications of left cardiac sympathetic denervation. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57(4):397-400.
  6. Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, et al. Treating electrical storm: sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation. 2000;102(7):742-747.
  7. Ross EM, Redman TT, Harper SA, et al. Dual defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;106:14-17.
  8. Hoch DH, Batsford WP, Greenberg SM, et al. Double sequential external shocks for refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(5):1141-1145.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: CardiacCardiovascularClinicalDefibrillationED Critical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysiciansEpinephrineHeartPatient CareshockSpontaneous CirculationTreatmentVentricular Fibrillation

Related

  • Push-Dose Pressors in the Emergency Department

    June 29, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Outpatient Mgmt. of Adults with Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure

    June 25, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: When Syncope Gets Hairy

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Treatment Strategies for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603