Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Sustainable Growth Rate Formula, Then and Now

By L. Anthony Cirillo, MD, FACEP | on March 7, 2014 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
The Sustainable Growth Rate Formula, Then and Now

How the SGR Medicare physician-payment formula became flawed and why a fix is unlikely in 2014

You Might Also Like
  • Reimbursement and coding updated for 2013
  • ACEP-Supported Issues, Bills at the 2014 Leadership and Advocacy Conference
  • Congress Repeals the SGR
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 03 – March 2014

Even before its passage into law in 1997, the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Medicare physician-payment formula was inherently flawed and doomed to worsen the problem it was intended to fix. By artificially, and unfairly, linking physician payments under Medicare to changes in the gross domestic product (GDP), the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established a system of payment that has actually worsened spiraling spending in the Medicare program. Since 2002, the SGR has likely led to higher Medicare spending by encouraging physicians to increase the volume of services provided to compensate for negative or negligible updates in reimbursement. Because everyone in the universe agrees that the SGR system is broken, physician advocacy groups, like the American Medical Association (AMA) and ACEP, annually parade to Capitol Hill to beg, plead, and demand that Congress fix the problem and replace the flawed formula. Unfortunately, more political posturing and a lack of true leadership in Congress will likely have us parading up to Capitol Hill again this year. How we ended up with a broken formula is easy to understand, but how to fix is not.

The History of Medicare Physician-Payment Reform and the SGR

Close your eyes, and imagine you are a “GP” back in the early 1970s. In many cases, after a claim for services was submitted, the check that arrived was actually for the full amount you billed, assuming the Medicare carrier felt the charge was reasonable under the “customary, prevailing, and reasonable” (CPR) system. There were no hard limits on payment per service. Now, I know many of you have opened your eyes and have screamed, “No way!” Better yet, if Medicare didn’t pay you the full amount billed, you could legally balance-bill your patient. Well, to no one’s surprise, Medicare expenditures began to rise under this system as more people enrolled in Medicare and more services were provided. Since the mid-’70s, Congress has failed to limit the amount of spending for Medicare Part B payments to physicians.

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” —George Santayana

Starting in 1975, Congress has attempted to reduce Medicare spending on physician services through a series of equally ineffective spending-control systems (eg, Medicare Economic Index [MEI], Medicare Fee Schedule [MFS], Resource-Based Relative Value Scale [RBRVS], and Medicare Volume Performance Standards [MVPS]). None of them worked.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: CongressCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth InsuranceLegalMedicaidMedicarePublic PolicySustainable Growth Rate

Related

  • July 2025 News from the College

    July 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

L. Anthony Cirillo, MD, FACEP

Dr. Cirillo serves on the ACEP Board of Directors. He still actively practices emergency medicine and serves as the director of government affairs for US Acute Care Solutions.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “The Sustainable Growth Rate Formula, Then and Now”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603