Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Study Highlights Lack of Outpatient Services, Even For Insured Patients

By Vidya Eswaran, MD | on August 14, 2018 | 0 Comment
Policy Rx
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Insurance Does Not Guarantee Access to Follow-Up Appointments
ILLUSTRATION: Chris Whissen & shutterstock.com

Editor’s Note: Read Dr. Cedric Dark’s commentary on this EMRA + PolicyRx Health Policy Journal Club article.

You Might Also Like
  • Insurance Status Tied to Likelihood of Hospital Transfer
  • Medicaid Access Improves When Physician Pay Increases
  • In States with Most Overdose Deaths, Poor Patients Struggle to Find Treatment
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 08 – August 2018

Increase outpatient services and you’ll decrease expensive ED visits, or so the popular axiom goes. This only works, however, if enough outpatient visits are available. A study by Medford-Davis et al examined the availability of outpatient orthopedic ankle appointments by insurance status.1

Privately insured patients had an 85 percent chance of success in securing appointments. Interestingly, the uninsured had the same odds as the privately insured in getting appointments. Both the insured and uninsured had much higher odds of receiving appointments than patients with Medicaid.

To make matters worse, most clinics were unable to offer Medicaid patients any resources about where they could receive care. When the authors checked the list of orthopedists accepting Medicaid, 15 stated they didn’t accept Medicaid, 11 did not treat ankle injuries, nine did not have working telephone numbers, and only three were able to schedule an appointment.

For the uninsured, just because appointments were available did not necessarily mean they were affordable. On average, uninsured patients were asked to pay $353.74, with only two patients able to secure appointments for less than $100. A quarter of clinics offered discounts for those paying in cash, and 8 percent offered payment plans. Clinics were compensated by privately insured patients at an average rate of $236 for a clinic visit and $36 for an X-ray, $77 less than the average charge to the uninsured. Medicaid, on the other hand, compensated clinics at a rate of $55 to $101 for the office visit and $26.73 for an X-ray. Only one in seven Medicaid patients were able to secure outpatient appointments. Uninsured patients, while better able to schedule appointments, encountered prohibitively high charges.

I’m sure I’m not alone in looking at patient complaints in the electronic medical record and wondering why patients were coming to the ED with problems that could clearly be treated in an outpatient setting. After reading this article and considering the amount of time the researchers must have spent attempting to schedule appointments, I am no longer surprised. When balancing real-life responsibilities such as work and childcare, who has the time to call multiple clinics to schedule an appointment? If we as a health care system truly believe that reducing ED visits and hospitalizations is the way to reduce health care costs, we must ensure that systems are in place to facilitate accessible and affordable outpatient care.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Access to Health CareHealth InsuranceMedicaidOutpatient Care

Related

  • Research Returns Spotlight to Physician ED Coverage

    April 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians Volunteer to Deliver Care

    December 4, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • June 2023 News From the College

    June 3, 2023 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “Study Highlights Lack of Outpatient Services, Even For Insured Patients”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603