Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Stop Performing Routine Pulse Checks During CPR

By Lauren Westafer, DO, MPH, MS, FACEP | on August 2, 2022 | 0 Comment
Practice Changers
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“Time to pause for a pulse check.”

Although this refrain is uttered during cardiac arrests across the United States each day, we are overdue to stop this practice. Interruptions in chest compressions are associated with decreased survival.1–3 As a result, focus has increasingly shifted to finding ways to ensure minimal interruptions in chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This has resulted in the de-emphasis on advanced airways and the introduction of mechanical chest compression devices. Traditional point of care ultrasound during cardiac arrest has faced scrutiny as data has demonstrated pauses of more than 10 seconds are common, leading some institutions to introduce transesophageal echocardiography.4,5 Some have even suggested hands-on defibrillation to reduce interruptions.6 However, there is a far easier way to improve the quality of CPR—stop routinely performing pulse checks during CPR.

You Might Also Like
  • Interrupting Chest Compressions During CPR Does Not Worsen Survival
  • ACEP member study says pit crew approach with real-time CPR feedback saves lives
  • Coding Wizard: Coding for CPR
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 08 – August 2022

Pulse Checks Are Hard

Despite the ubiquity of pulse checks, few people can accurately determine whether a patient is pulseless in under 10 seconds. In a 1996 study of patients on cardiopulmonary bypass, study participants were blinded to whether the flow was pulsatile or non-pulsatile and asked to perform a carotid pulse check. Only 16.5 percent of the 206 first responder participants were able to determine that a patient was pulseless in under 10 seconds. Further, only two percent correctly recognized truly pulseless patients.7

A similar study by Tibballs et al., in 2010 evaluated pulse palpation by 154 nurses and physicians on individuals on extracorporeal devices. They found pulse palpation was only 78 percent accurate. The mean time to a decision about the presence of a pulse was 20 seconds and was slightly longer in the physician cohort (24 seconds) compared with the nursing cohort (17 seconds). One of the most worrisome findings of this study was that participants reported the presence of a pulse in 14 percent of cases when it did not. Participants took an average of 30 seconds to diagnose cardiac arrest. By comparison, participants were able to diagnose the absence of cardiac arrest in an average of 13 seconds.8

The Guidelines Dropped Routine Pulse Checks Over a Decade Ago

In response to these studies demonstrating the complexity to pulse palpation, the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines in 2010 began discouraging routine pulse checks during CPR: “Because of difficulties with pulse assessments, interruptions in chest compressions for a pulse check should be minimized during the resuscitation, even to determine if ROSC has occurred.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: CPRpulse checksResuscitation

Related

  • Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Life-Sustaining Therapy

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Coronary Vasospasm-Induced Cardiac Arrest

    December 6, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • AHA and Red Cross Life Support Certifications Should Both Be Accepted

    November 7, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Stop Performing Routine Pulse Checks During CPR”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603