Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Sore Throats—What Really Works?

By ACEP Now | on August 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
  • Conjunctivitis
  • Coryza
  • Cough
  • Diarrhea

Source: Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;35:113-25

You Might Also Like
  • Myths in Emergency Medicine: 24-Hour Treatment with Antibiotics for Strep Throat
  • Emergency Physicians Don’t Follow Evidence When Prescribing Antibiotics, and That Needs to Change
  • Keep the Customer Satisfied
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 08 – August 2010

[/sidebar]

Rapid Strep Test vs. Throat Culture

A throat culture is considered the “gold standard,” with sensitivity of approximately 95%. However, rapid strep testing has been recently advocated by many societies because:9

  • Newer assays have adequate sensitivity (90%-95%) and specificity (90%-99%).8
  • Reduces unnecessary short-term treatment while waiting for cultures.
  • Potentially reduces need for callbacks.
  • Allows timely initiation of antibiotics, reducing acute morbidity and contagion.
  • Has high patient satisfaction despite wait times.

In contrast, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends routine rapid antigen testing and routine culture in all children with suspected strep pharyngitis because of a higher incidence of GABHS infection and the higher sensitivity of a throat culture. What is the “best practice” at this time for my patient? Overall, following a clinical decision rule and/or selective testing to help identify patients who are most likely to benefit from antibiotic treatment appears to be the best course of action.8

Antiobiotics for a GABHS Infection

One of the largest reviews on this subject is from the Cochrane database.10 The review included trials of antibiotic against control with either measures of the typical symptoms (throat soreness, headache, or fever) or suppurative or nonsuppurative complications. Suppurative complications include acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, and quinsy (peritonsillar abscess), while nonsuppurative complications include acute glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever (ARF).

What did the reviewers find? Throat soreness and fever were reduced by antibiotics by about 50%, with the greatest difference seen at 3-4 days (which correlated to the time when symptoms of 50% of placebo patients had resolved). The overall number need to treat (NNT) to prevent one sore throat at day 3 was 5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9-7.0); at 7 days it was 21 (95% CI 13.2-47.9). Additional subgroup analyses of symptom reduction found that antibiotics were more effective against symptoms at day 3, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.71) for GABHS-positive swabs vs. an RR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-0.97) if negative. At week 1, the RR with antibiotics was 0.29 (95% CI 0.12-0.70) vs. 0.73 with a control (95% CI 0.50-1.07). For suppurative complications, antibiotics reduced the incidence of acute otitis media (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.58) with an NNT of 50, and of peritonsillar abscess (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.47) with an NNT of 46.

A more recent national database study of more than 1 million sore throats found a much higher NNT of over 4,000.11 For nonsuppurative complications, no conclusive evidence exists to support the belief that antibiotics protect against acute glomerulonephritis. Several studies found antibiotics reduced ARF by more than two-thirds (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.02-2.08), with an NNT of 41.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Single Page

Topics: AntibioticClinical ExamClinical GuidelineCMEDiagnosisEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianENTInfectious DiseasePatient SafetyProcedures and SkillsPublic HealthQuality

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Intersections of Physical and Mental Health Disorders

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Reader Responds: Why Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Matter in Medical Education

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Sore Throats—What Really Works?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603