Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Sore Throats—What Really Works?

By ACEP Now | on August 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

In a typical adult population of sore throat patients with a prevalence rate of “strep throat” infections of 5%-15%, a Centor score of 0-1 means a patient has a less than 5% likelihood of having a GABHS infection. A score of 2-3 means a 5%-30% likelihood, while a score of 4 means an approximately 30%-60% likelihood of GABHS infection.

You Might Also Like
  • Myths in Emergency Medicine: 24-Hour Treatment with Antibiotics for Strep Throat
  • Emergency Physicians Don’t Follow Evidence When Prescribing Antibiotics, and That Needs to Change
  • Keep the Customer Satisfied
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 08 – August 2010

The Centor criteria are most useful in “ruling out” the possibility of a GABHS infection if the score is 0-1.1 Similarly, patients with “common cold” symptoms (runny or congested nose, mild cough) in addition to their sore throat symptoms have a very low likelihood of having a GABHS infection and do not require antibiotic therapy. From this estimation, we can see that a large number of patients with a Centor score of 2-3 or even 4 will receive unnecessary antibiotics.

Many societies have weighed in on this issue. There are three options recommended to help us make a diagnosis.8 Patients with a Centor score of 0 or 1 need no testing and should be treated symptomatically. For others:

  • Do a rapid antigen test in patients with scores of 2, 3, or 4 and prescribe antibiotics only for those with positive results.
  • Do a rapid antigen test for strep in patients with scores of 2 or 3. Patients with positive test results and those with a Centor score of 4 (no testing) get antibiotics.
  • Do no testing and give antiobiotics to patients with Centor scores of 3 or 4.

Obviously, there are drawbacks to all of these approaches. Some patients not treated based simply on a Centor score of 2 risk undertreatment. On the other hand, children and adolescents aged 5-15 years have carriage rates as high as 25% during “strep throat season,” so treating all who have a positive rapid antigen test (or throat culture) will result in overtreatment of patients with viral pharyngitis and strep carriage. However, any approach that relies on the Centor score, rapid antigen testing, or a combination of the two is superior to, and more rational than, the approach of just giving all patients antibiotics.

Figure 1. Clinical and epidemiologic findings and diagnosis of pharyngitis due to GABHS

Features suggestive of GABHS as etiologic agent include:

  • Sudden onset
  • Sore throat
  • Fever
  • Headache
  • Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain
  • Inflammation of pharynx and tonsils
  • Patchy discrete exudates
  • Tender, enlarged anterior cervical nodes
  • Patient aged 5-15 years
  • Presentation in winter or early spring
  • History of exposure

Features suggestive of viral etiology include:

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Single Page

Topics: AntibioticClinical ExamClinical GuidelineCMEDiagnosisEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianENTInfectious DiseasePatient SafetyProcedures and SkillsPublic HealthQuality

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Intersections of Physical and Mental Health Disorders

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Reader Responds: Why Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Matter in Medical Education

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Sore Throats—What Really Works?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603