Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Patient Flow Improvements to Boost Efficiency in Small Emergency Departments

By Shari Welch, MD, FACEP | on June 19, 2017 | 1 Comment
Special OPs
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The emergency department at Houlton Regional Hospital (HRH) in Houlton, Maine, wanted to take its operational performance to the next level. This Critical Access Hospital (CAH) seeing 11,000 visits a year struggled with patient surges. As is the case in many CAHs, HRH was challenged with recruiting new physicians, especially hospitalists, who are so critical to ED flow. (Approximately 25 percent of Americans choose to live in rural areas, while only 10 percent of physicians choose to practice there.) Further, the emergency department has only single coverage, and was easily overwhelmed by one critically ill patient. Finally, HRH struggled to manage the behavioral health burden in its nine-bed emergency department.

You Might Also Like
  • Rhode Island Hospital ED Boosts Efficiency by Adopting Brown University Patient Flow Model
  • Intermountain Medical Center in Utah Improves Efficiency, Performance with Vertical Flow Model
  • Design Emergency Departments to Boost Patient, Staff Satisfaction
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 06 – June 2017

CEO Tom Moakler, ED Medical Director Brian Griffin, and Nursing Director Tricia Murray wanted to re-engineer patient flow in their department during peak flow times to improve efficiency. They began with an ambitious change package:

  • Redesign intake
  • Repurpose triage as a rapid treatment unit (RTU) (low-acuity service line)
  • Re-engineer patient flow for high-flow/low-flow times of the day
  • Develop a night plan with the hospitalists

Redesign Intake

The emergency department had continued to use traditional nurse triage and booth registration, followed by traditional ED patient flow. This did not serve it well during peak arrival times. The leadership did a number of things that help expedite intake and patient care in the single-covered emergency department.1 Traditional triage was replaced with an abbreviated triage and a “pull-to-full” model to bring the patients, provider, nurses, and registration to the bedside.2 This takes all of the steps of intake and conducts them in parallel instead of in series, which is inarguably more efficient.

CEO Tom Moakler, ED Medical Director Brian Griffin, and Nursing Director Tricia Murray (left to right).

CEO Tom Moakler, ED Medical Director Brian Griffin, and Nursing Director Tricia Murray (left to right).

Houlton Regional Hospital’s rapid treatment unit area serves as a place to care for low-acuity patients.

Houlton Regional Hospital’s rapid treatment unit area serves as a place to care for low-acuity patients.

Repurpose Triage as an RTU

The former triage area is now the RTU area, which serves as a place to care for low-acuity patients rather than placing them in a traditional bed. In the old flow model, low-acuity patients often suffered long waits and delays because no resources were dedicated to them. This new low-acuity zone cannot support its own provider, but it can have nurses and staff dedicated to the rapid processing of patients. In addition, nurses are empowered to begin standardized, chief complaint–driven order sets. This has long been recognized as a best practice, particularly in single-coverage departments, so that patients are always moving along their patient flow journey.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: EfficiencyEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysiciansHoulton Regional HospitalMainePatient CarePatient FlowPractice ManagementQuality & SafetyRedesignRuralTriage

Related

  • Opinion: Demand Up, Beds Down—The Emergency Dept. Crowding Crisis

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

Shari Welch, MD, FACEP

Shari Welch, MD, FACEP, is a practicing emergency physician with Utah Emergency Physicians and a research fellow at the Intermountain Institute for Health Care Delivery Research. She has written numerous articles and three books on ED quality, safety, and efficiency. She is a consultant with Quality Matters Consulting, and her expertise is in ED operations.

View this author's posts »

One Response to “Patient Flow Improvements to Boost Efficiency in Small Emergency Departments”

  1. July 5, 2017

    Todd Reply

    I am surprised how casually bridge orders are mentioned as a component to improving ED throughput.

    ACEP explicitly has a written policy discouraging this practice, and rightfully so:

    https://www.acep.org/Clinical—Practice-Management/Writing-Admission-and-Transition-Orders/

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603