Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

PaACEP Response to Capital Health BC CHIP Program Process Improvement Initiative

By ACEP Now | on April 3, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In Pennsylvania, as across the U.S. as a whole, emergency medicine constitutes an essential strut in the support of a health care system that is increasingly overtaxed and underfunded. Nationally, in 2010 there were 129.8 million emergency department visits, or 42.8 visits per 100 persons, of which 13.3 percent resulted in hospital admission, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data. Of the more than 110 million patients who were seen in the ED and not admitted to the hospital, the majority not only had health insurance, but also had a health care provider that they would identify as a source of primary care. For many of these insured patients, ease of access, relative speed of care (compared to primary care office visits), and patient perceptions of quality in a hospital-based resource-rich environment are principal drivers of ED utilization. For uninsured patients, the ED often represents their only available venue in which to receive health care. Yet, emergency medicine accounts for only 2 percent to 4 percent of the nation’s total health expenditures, according to AHRQ data.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Initiative Supporting ‘Prudent Layperson’ Standard Becomes Law in Health Care Reform Act
  • New Study: EPs Key to Reducing Health Care Costs
  • Project ETHAN Telehealth Program Cuts Number of Emergency Department Transports in Houston

By virtue of statutory regulations that require type A emergency departments to provide unscheduled care 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, EDs represent an irreplaceable part of the health care safety net for all patient categories. Further, due to the obligation to remain constantly staffed and available, the marginal cost (the cost of seeing the next case) of ED care is often less than that incurred in other venues. While hospital (facility or “technical”) component fees typically drive up the cost of emergency care, professional fee billing by emergency physicians is generally in line with that of office-based providers for similar levels of evaluation and management (E/M) services. Moreover, it must be recognized that the E/M services provided in an ED quite often serve to obviate “unnecessary” hospital admissions; in such circumstances, the care provided in the ED, often characterized as “expensive,” nonetheless represents considerable cost savings when compared to the expense of hospital inpatient care.

Medicaid enrollees of all age groups use EDs as a source of episodic care. There is evidence that Medicaid beneficiaries may use the ED more frequently than non-Medicaid patients. However, recent study has demonstrated that most Medicaid usage of EDs is appropriate, and related to more serious or urgent complaints.

Under the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicaid enrollment for all age groups is expected to increase by 16 million over the next decade. Included in this expansion would be a rise in the number of Pennsylvania CHIP beneficiaries, currently reported as 187,634 statewide as of April 2013, according to Pennsylvania Insurance Department data.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Single Page

Topics: Care Team

Related

  • EMS and the ED: What Should the Relationship Look Like Going Forward?

    November 23, 2021 - 0 Comment
  • Tips for Productive Hospital Policy Discussions

    August 31, 2021 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Reports Progress on Workforce Issues

    July 27, 2021 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “PaACEP Response to Capital Health BC CHIP Program Process Improvement Initiative”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603