Last year, the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and several other organizations released a joint clinical practice guideline that addressed a wide set of issues related to prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of asymptomatic hypertension in adults, including redefining the concept of “hypertensive urgency.”1
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: May 2026“In the past we used this term ‘hypertensive urgency’ and primary care doctors, if they saw someone with a [blood pressure] BP of 180/120 or higher, would reflexively send them to the emergency department (ED),” said Joseph Miller, MD, MS, an emergency physician at Henry Ford Health in Detroit.
In fact, an older study showed that from 2006 to 2015, hypertension was the primary complaint in 0.6 percent of all ED visits—more than 6.2 million visits—whether referred from a physician or through self-referral.2
What was called hypertensive urgency is now referred to as severe hypertension and is defined as a BP >180/120 mm Hg without evidence of acute target organ damage.
“The ACC/AHA guideline has gotten rid of that term and encouraged that it be wiped from the medical lexicon,” Dr. Miller said. “And, fortunately, the number of referrals to the ED already appears to be dropping and will hopefully continue to drop.”
That is because the guideline recommends that these patients should not receive aggressive BP lowering in the short term or be given parenteral antihypertensive drug therapy. Instead, it calls for a reinstitution or intensification of oral antihypertensive medications, ideally in an outpatient setting.1
However, according to Curt Dill, MD, associate professor of emergency medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, “there is often a disconnect between what should be done ideally, and what can be done in the real world.”
Complexities
Despite this update from the ACC/AHA, practice patterns for addressing asymptomatic hypertension vary in emergency medicine. In its 2013 Clinical Policy, ACEP did not recommend routine ED medical interventions for these patients, unless the patient had poor follow-up or was considered high risk.3 However, in an update published in 2025, ACEP amended this recommendation based on a more recent study that showed that initiating antihypertensive medications in the ED lowered BP in the short term without any increase in adverse events.4,5 The guideline gives a Level C recommendation to consider the initiation of outpatient antihypertensive medications, with a referral for outpatient follow-up.
“The [ACC/AHA] guidelines are good, but in practice clinicians have to assess what kind of access each individual patient has to good general primary care—that is also a key driver,” Dr. Dill said. “Working in an urban environment, for example, most of the patients we see are not going to call their primary care doctor to see them in a week for a resting BP.”
Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page





One Response to “New Guidelines Clarify Outpatient Treatment of Asymptomatic Hypertension”
May 24, 2026
Gabe WilsonThis is a tricky area with more nuance than people realize. Messaging to patients is absolutely critical and often botched.
If an asymptomatic patient comes to the ED with severe hypertension, no symptoms, no end organ damage, the worst thing you can say is: “We don’t have to do anything now. You don’t have an emergency.” That is a message of minimization for a patient who, for whatever reason, made the decision to present themselves to the medical system to get care. With a high-risk condition.
Yes, it will not produce a stroke or MI tomorrow. But eventually, that patient is at extremely high risk for serious morbidity. And we know that even under the care of a physician, up to 50% of patients in the U.S. never get their blood pressure under adequate control. That is not a reassuring baseline.
So please. Do not minimize. Acknowledge. Give the patient credit for coming in. “It was lucky you came in so we can get something started.” That single sentence reframes the entire encounter from dismissal to partnership.
And then act. Start an oral medication. Set expectations that the dose will be increased or additional agents will be added if the initial treatment does not bring their blood pressure under control. Emphasize close follow-up. Emphasize adherence. Give them a concrete plan, not a vague reassurance.
Because the alternative is what happens in emergency departments every day. The patient is told they are fine. They leave feeling dismissed. They do not follow up. And they become one of the 50% of hypertensive patients in this country who never achieve adequate control, with all the strokes, heart attacks, renal failure, and premature death that follows.
Do not tell patients they do not need to be there. You have just decreased the likelihood that they will ever get their blood pressure under control.