Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

New Adventures (and Studies!) in Fluid Resuscitation

By Ryan Patrick Radecki, MD, MS | on October 5, 2022 | 0 Comment
Pearls From the Medical Literature
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As with any snapshot of evidence, this remains only a piece of the puzzle with respect to the utility of prehospital blood products in trauma. These authors do not parse out specific causes of death, and generally most patients were not yet in hemorrhagic shock on arrival at the hospital. This is presumably linked to the short transport times involved from the scene to definitive care, reducing the likelihood of exsanguination prior to hospital arrival.

You Might Also Like
  • Time-to-Hospital May Be Key to Disparate Results in Studies on Pre-Hospital Plasma Administration
  • ACEP15 Session: Best Practices in Sepsis Fluid Therapy
  • Data Suggests Lactated Ringer’s Is Better than Normal Saline
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 10 – October 2022

The RePHILL trial fits in with other trials of prehospital plasma or prehospital blood products. It informs resource management for urban prehospital systems with short transport times. Replacing blood with blood has obvious face validity, but many other clinical scenarios have found conservative transfusion thresholds are not harmful. Early in the course of traumatic hemorrhage, with prehospital shock but substantial remaining reserve, aggressive early use of blood products may not be providing the hoped-for survival advantage. Future trials ought to illuminate at which point the resuscitation can switch from crystalloid to blood products.


Dr. RadeckiDr. Radecki is an emergency physician and informatician with Christchurch Hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand. He is the Annals of Emergency Medicine podcast co-host and Journal Club editor and can be found on Twitter @emlitofnote.

References

  1. Brown J, Lane A, Cooper C, Vassar M. The results of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine are frequently fragile. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(6):565-576.
  2. Parish AJ, Yuan DMK, Raggi JR, Omotoso OO, West JR, Ioannidis JPA. An umbrella review of effect size, bias, and power across meta‐analyses in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2021;28(12):1379-1388.
  3. Fanaroff AC, Califf RM, Windecker S, Smith SC, Lopes RD. Levels of evidence supporting american college of cardiology/american heart association and european society of cardiology guidelines, 2008-2018. JAMA. 2019;321(11):1069.
  4. Ibrahim SA, Reynolds KA, Poon E, Alam M. The evidence base for US joint commission hospital accreditation standards: cross sectional study. BMJ. Published online June 23, 2022:e063064. Hill, K. How Target figured out a teen girl was pregnant before her father did. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did. Published February 16, 2012. Accessed September 22, 2022.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: IV fluidPlasmaResuscitationSaline

Related

  • Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Life-Sustaining Therapy

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Coronary Vasospasm-Induced Cardiac Arrest

    December 6, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Neonatal Resuscitation Tips

    November 6, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “New Adventures (and Studies!) in Fluid Resuscitation”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603