Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

More Readers Respond to AHRQ Report on Diagnostic Errors in the ED

By Myles Riner, MD; David L Meyers, MD, MBE, FACEP | on March 5, 2023 | 0 Comment
Break Room Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
The Break Room

Re: “Report on ED Diagnostic Errors Sparks Controversy”

What is needed here is not a response, but a retraction and a complete rewrite. Unfortunately, the damage has been done, and even a retraction will be mostly ignored. Bad science for the sake of headlines is worse than irresponsible.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Responds to AHRQ Report on Diagnostic Errors in the ED
  • Report on ED Diagnostic Errors Sparks Controversy
  • The AHRQ Diagnostic Errors Study: A Peer Reviewer’s Reaction
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 03 – March 2023

— Myles Riner, MD

Re: “The AHRQ Diagnostic Errors Study: A Peer Reviewer’s Reaction”

Well, the more I read the responses of ACEP and other EM-associated organizations to the AHRQ/Hopkins study, the more embarrassed I am for emergency medicine. Even acknowledging the flaws of the study, the defensive nature of many of those responses and the criticism of the messengers are what one might expect from the troglodytes at the AMA, not from our organization, that purports to have patient well-being and advocacy for them as a major focus.

In the interest of transparency, David Newman-Toker, one of the lead authors on the study, is a friend of mine as well as a former colleague on the board of the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine. He and I have discussed the study on more than one occasion, and I conveyed to him that ACEP’s and patients’ interests would have been much better served by an acknowledgement of the magnitude of the problem of the frequency and severity of diagnostic errors and the associated harm in the course of emergency care, a description of what ACEP and others have been doing to address the problem, our successes and our continuing focus on doing better.

A more reasoned response, like the one just published in JAMA would have been so much more responsible and helpful. What ACEP and its partners in this matter have done has only deepened animosity toward medicine and doctors while accomplishing nothing to improve diagnosis.

I think ACEP is on the wrong side of history in this matter, and I can’t imagine that patients and families, so many of whom have stories about their own personal diagnostic misadventures in the ER (I do; do you?), will find the position of the College and its co-signers credible let alone admirable.

— David L Meyers, MD, MBE, FACEP

Topics: AHRQAHRQ’s Diagnostic Error StudyQuality & Safety

Related

  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Waiting Room Medicine: The Ethical Conundrum

    March 9, 2025 - 2 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “More Readers Respond to AHRQ Report on Diagnostic Errors in the ED”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603