Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Killing Me Softly … with Normal Saline?

By Richard Cunningham, MD | on June 15, 2022 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The study was actually stopped early when the intervention group that received the IV fluid bolus showed an increased mortality of 45 percent. While it is important to recognize the limitations of this study (most of the children presented with malaria, which may predispose the patients to harm from a fluid bolus, and the study was conducted in hospitals without ICU-level capabilities) the results are nonetheless both thought-provoking and unsettling.

You Might Also Like
  • Data Suggests Lactated Ringer’s Is Better than Normal Saline
  • The Death of Normal Saline: IV Fluids in 2019
  • Reader Feedback Revisits Lactated Ringer’s vs. Normal Saline Discussion
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 06 – June 2022

Water, Water, Everywhere…

Despite their limitations, IV fluids are here to stay, but the next time you consider another bolus to determine whether or not your patient is “fluid-responsive,” perhaps you should take a step back and ask yourself if they actually instead need blood, vasopressors, or another intervention in the next step of their care. When it comes to fluid “resuscitation,” it turns out that less is indeed more. 


Dr. Cunningham is a third-year emergency medicine resident at Maricopa Medical Center and soon-to-be critical care fellow at Stanford Medical Center in Standford, Calif.

References

  1. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829-839. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1711584.
  2. Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al. Balanced Multielectrolyte Solution versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(9):815-826. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2114464.
  3. Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al. Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial [published online ahead of print, 2021 Aug 10]. JAMA. 2021;326(9):1-12. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.11684.
  4. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1243-1251. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208627.
  5. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(17):1105-1109. doi:10.1056/NEJM199410273311701.
  6. Lier H, Fries D. Emergency Blood Transfusion for Trauma and Perioperative Resuscitation: Standard of Care. Transfus Med Hemother. 2021;48(6):366-376. Published 2021 Oct 29. doi:10.1159/000519696.
  7. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368-1377. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa010307.
  8. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1496-506. 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380.
  9. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1301-11. 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
  10. ProCESS Investigators , Yealy DM, Kellum JA, et al. A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1683-93. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602.
  11. Sadaka F, Juarez M, Naydenov S, O‘Brien J. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: the effect of increasing fluid balance on mortality. J Intensive Care Med. 2014;29(4):213-217. doi:10.1177/0885066613478899.
  12. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):259-265. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
  13. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
  14. Permpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, Trainarongsakul T, Chakorn T, Udompanturak S. Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation (CENSER). A Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(9):1097-1105. doi:10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC.
  15. Bai X, Yu W, Ji W, et al. Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):532. Published 2014 Oct 3. doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y.
  16. Ford SR, Visram A. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(14):1348-1353. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1108712.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: IV fluidlactated Ringer'snormal saline

Related

  • New Adventures (and Studies!) in Fluid Resuscitation

    October 5, 2022 - 0 Comment
  • 2021’s Literature in Review: TXA, tPA, Fluids, Antibiotics, and Minor Miracles

    December 16, 2021 - 0 Comment
  • The Death of Normal Saline: IV Fluids in 2019

    November 5, 2019 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “Killing Me Softly … with Normal Saline?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603