Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

In Emergency Medicine, Mistakes Are Harsh Teachers

By Benjamin Thomas, MD | on October 20, 2020 | 1 Comment
Images in EM
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
Benjamin Thomas
PHOTO BENJAMIN THOMAS

In emergency medicine, no one ever wants to make a mistake. We assume worst first because at any minute a life could be at stake. As a resident, I was no stranger to making some mistakes. I had cases with bad outcomes, yet the impact of the cases seemed to always be shielded by the umbrella of working with another attending. I don’t think I ever appreciated how high the stakes were until my name was the sole one on the chart. My first “miss” as an attending made me understand the gravity of even the smallest decisions I make as a physician.

You Might Also Like
  • Opinion: Institute of Medicine Report on Medical Misdiagnoses Overly Critical of Emergency Medicine
  • The 10 Biggest Financial Mistakes Doctors Make
  • Are shorter work hours for medical interns harming patients?
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 10 – October 2020

The patient was a middle-aged woman with a history of chronic pain, fibromyalgia, and bipolar disorder who presented with constipation and abdominal pain. She was over a week out from a laparoscopic appendectomy. Prior to her emergency department arrival, she had an outpatient CT for abdominal pain that was negative and she had met with her surgeon the day prior. She reported three days of constipation, two episodes of nonbloody and nonbilious vomiting, and diffuse abdominal pain. She was taking an oral opioid around the clock for pain. Her last bowel movement was the night prior, and she was tolerating liquids. On exam, she was mildly tender to palpation throughout, and her abdomen was slightly distended. My initial thought was that she was suffering from an opioid-induced ileus. I considered a small bowel obstruction, but she was still passing gas, tolerating oral intake, and having bowel movements. Her exam wasn’t worrisome, and she didn’t have any concerning signs of a deeper infection.

Her labs were reassuring, and she had a kidney, ureter, and bladder test that seemed consistent with an ileus. She remained in the emergency department for some hours and, after a few attempts, still could not have a successful bowel movement. I discharged her home with return precautions. Several hours later, she came back in distress. A subsequent CT scan showed a high-grade obstructed volvulus with perforation and a large amount of intraperitoneal air. She was rushed to the operating and had almost 70 cm of necrotic bowel removed. She had a prolonged and complicated hospital course. She would ultimately survive and leave the hospital, but her life was never the same after.

I was devastated after hearing the news of this case. I kept thinking I shouldn’t have let her go. At that point, I was a year out of residency and had no outcomes like this. My confidence was crushed, and I needed to find a way to rebuild. An attending once told me that I would make more mistakes than I could remember and would be named in at least one lawsuit in the course of my career. I remember being skeptical of this as a resident—more so at the notion of making so many mistakes rather than being sued. Of course, no one can expect a physician to make the right decision 100 percent of the time. To err is to be human, of course.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: BiasEducation

Related

  • Reader Responds: The Intersections of Physical and Mental Health Disorders

    January 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Intersections of Physical and Mental Health Disorders

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Reader Responds: Why Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Matter in Medical Education

    October 9, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

Benjamin Thomas, MD

Dr. Thomas is an attending physician in the emergency department at Kaiser Permanente (Greater Southern Alameda area).

View this author's posts »

One Response to “In Emergency Medicine, Mistakes Are Harsh Teachers”

  1. October 25, 2020

    Gary Gechlik Reply

    A very well written article. Another way to approach the issue is as a case study in emergency medicine testing innovation. The patient previously had a recent CT scan of the abdomen that was negative. In those cases, a KUB would not have the sensitivity, so a repeated CT of the abdomen would be helpful. As an algorithm, if a patient returns with a complication post procedure, focus on the test that has equal or superior sensitivity and specificity. Also, focus on the modality that continues to improve. CT Scan continues to innovate, lower radiation, superior reconstruction, less ambiguity, whereas the KUB is nearly obsolete, it is the same test as when it was introduced nearly a century ago.

    I have made the same mistake early in my professional life as well, because history and physical examination can be unreliable in the case of abdominal pain in elderly patients, after abdominal procedures, or those who cannot offer an adequate history. A good article from 2012:

    Int J Gen Med. 2012; 5: 525–533. Published online 2012 Jun 13. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S17410 PMCID: PMC3396109 PMID: 22807640 Plain abdominal radiography in acute abdominal pain; past, present, and future

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396109/

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603