Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

How CMS’ Value-Based Modifier Program May Affect Emergency Physicians

By Michael A. Granovsky, MD, FACEP and Stacie Schilling Jones, MPH | on July 15, 2015 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Figure 1. Determination of VBM Amount

You Might Also Like
  • Physician value-based payment modifier starts in 2015
  • What Emergency Physicians Need to Know about the 2016 CMS Fee Schedule
  • ACEP Launches 2014 PQRS Registry Reporting System
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 07 – July 2015

(Click for larger image) Figure 1. Determination of VBM Amount

The Affordable Care Act requires that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) apply a value-based modifier (VBM) to Medicare physician fee schedule payments starting with select physicians in 2015 and all physicians by 2017. Unlike the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), which is a pay-for-reporting program that focuses only on quality, the VBM is tied to physician performance on a composite of quality and cost measures. Since 2017 VBM adjustments are based on 2015 performance and apply to group practices of any size, as well as solo practitioners, it is critical that emergency physicians understand how they may be affected by this program.

Quality and Cost Scores

The VBM program scores physician performance based on both quality and cost. Quality is scored under six different quality domains, which ultimately yield a quality composite score. Cost is scored under three different cost domains, which ultimately yield a cost composite score. The quality and cost composite scores are then combined to yield a group’s VBM payment adjustment. Importantly, CMS will not include in its calculations measures for which a group or solo practitioner was attributed fewer than 20 cases. In cases where there is insufficient data, CMS will classify the emergency physician’s performance as “average” for purposes of calculating the composite score (see Figure 1).

The benchmark for each quality measure is based on the national mean of each measure’s performance rate during the year prior to the performance year. The benchmarks for the cost measures are the national mean of performance rates but are further adjusted based on the specialty mix of the providers in the group. Cost measures are also payment-standardized to adjust for geographic differences and risk-adjusted based on patient characteristics.

Table 1. Calculation of the 2017 VBM, Large Groups

(Click for larger image) Table 1. Calculation of the 2017 VBM, Large Groups

Calculation of the 2017 VBM

CMS will divide the total scores for all physicians into three tiers based on whether they are above, at, or below the national mean. As the program has evolved, CMS has set lower thresholds for smaller groups based on potentially limited group resources. CMS stratifies between groups of >10 eligible providers (see Table 1) and those with two to nine eligible providers and solo practitioners (see Table 2). Of note, eligible providers are defined as all physicians and advanced practice providers, including part-timers and moonlighters, working for the group.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: CMSEmergency PhysicianMedicarePractice ManagementValue-Based Modifier

Related

  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Authors

Michael A. Granovsky, MD, FACEP

Michael Granovsky, MD, FACEP, president of coding for LogixHealth.

View this author's posts »

Stacie Schilling Jones, MPH

Stacie Schilling Jones is director of quality and health information technology in the public affairs division of ACEP in Washington, D.C.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “How CMS’ Value-Based Modifier Program May Affect Emergency Physicians”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603