Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

No Hors D’Oeuvres, Please

By David F. Baehren, M.D. | on January 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The latest nationwide fad in the marketing of emergency medicine is the “Senior ED.” I’m sure many of you have heard the radio ads or seen the billboards. There’s an older voice spouting the virtues of comfortable beds, highly competent nurses, and a quiet environment. It’s ED nirvana.

You Might Also Like
  • Members in the News
  • Senior EDs: More Than Better Lighting
  • An Untimely Death
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 01 – January 2012

I’m surprised it took hospitals this long to figure this out. My place has been a Senior ED for some time now. A quick glance at the board reveals a large selection of people born about the time of the Hoover administration. We managed to attract all sorts of old people without the hype.

We all work in Senior EDs, but this marketing touts that a particular hospital has decided to specifically cater to the crowd born before the invention of FM radio. Patient nurses who can speak loudly, large clocks, nonslip floors, comfortable beds, large flat-screen televisions, and acoustic surfaces are just a few of the innovations.

I think that these improvements are keen and boss (gotta know the slang if you’re going to work in a Senior ED). These enhancements are so fantastic that I believe they would be great for all our patients. Who wants noise? Who wants to slip and fall? Who wants to get a precipitous bedsore from reclining on cardboard masquerading as a mattress? And who would not want a spacious quiet room in which to receive flowers while waiting 20 hours for an inpatient bed?

These things are universally delightful. So I say to you, Mr. Hospital Administrator, we should do these things for all our patients. But before we do, there are a few other issues to address. Why are our patients sentenced to a day of torture in the ED before they can get to an inpatient bed? (I suppose the cramped double room upstairs doesn’t seem so bad after a day with us in the ED.) And why do we have a workspace that was built for half of our current census?

Our administration is working to improve our situation, but we still have some days when bunk beds are needed. I made the suggestion that we might need to add hanging numbers so we can keep better track of hall patients. Doing this would be good for patient safety; however, I believe that the day we hang numbers from the ceiling is the day we admit defeat. We admit that the hospital is so inefficient that patients cannot be discharged in a timely fashion and rooms cannot be cleaned promptly. We admit that the solution is so far off that “temporary” numbers are needed, and we delude ourselves that the administrators will not start counting these spots as real rooms as if there were walls, sinks, suction, and an overhead light.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: AdmissionCareer DevelopmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianIn the ArenaPractice ManagementPractice Trends

Related

  • ACEP4U: Reinventing Research Education

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “No Hors D’Oeuvres, Please”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603