Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

A High-Value Diagnostic Approach to Low-Back Pain

By Michelle Lin, MD, MPH and Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS | on March 7, 2014 | 2 Comments
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
A High-Value Diagnostic Approach to Low-Back Pain

Instead of imaging, a clinical history and physical exam can safely evaluate back pain in ED patients with no history of major trauma

You Might Also Like
  • Low Back Pain Emergencies Could Signal Neurological Injuries
  • Naproxen, Diazepam Evaluated for Treating Acute, Nontraumatic Low Back Pain
  • Opioid Risk Tool Pegs Addiction Likelihood at Less Than 0.2% for Low-Risk Chronic-Pain Patients
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 03 – March 2014

Halfway through a busy overnight shift, the healthy 45-year-old man you are seeing for low-back pain says, “Doc, my back is killing me—the pain is shooting down my leg! Can’t you do an X-ray or CAT scan to tell me what’s wrong with me?” You took a full history and examined him thoroughly, and you don’t think imaging will reveal anything emergent, but as you consider launching into a long explanation about the risks and benefits of imaging, you hear a new ambulance arrival. You worry that after counseling he will still want imaging, and you know that your patient-satisfaction scores are monitored closely, so you order an X-ray and analgesia and decide to reassess the patient later.

As emergency physicians, we have two roles in evaluating back pain: to treat patients’ symptoms and to diagnose potentially life or limb threatening causes.

Back pain is one of the most common emergency department presenting complaints, accounting for more than 2.6 million visits in 2006.1 As emergency physicians, we have two roles in evaluating back pain: to treat patients’ symptoms and to diagnose potentially life- or limb-threatening causes. In 2006, more than 30 percent of ED patients with back pain underwent an X-ray, and nearly 10 percent underwent CT or MRI, an increase from 3.2 percent in 2002, despite the fact that imaging is not associated with improvement in clinical outcomes.1,2

Table 1. High-Risk History and Physical  Examination Findings Warranting Further Workup5

Table 1. High-Risk History and Physical Examination Findings Warranting Further Workup5

A thorough clinical history and exam in patients with no history of major trauma can identify many patients for whom imaging can be avoided. Important high-risk findings (see Table 1) of bowel or bladder incontinence, significant or evolving motor and/or sensory deficit, IV drug abuse or unexplained fever, history of cancer, and advanced age (typically >70 years) are reasons to obtain imaging for low-back pain. Otherwise, imaging rarely alters management, and the emphasis should be on treatment, reassurance, and education. This is supported by guidelines from both the American College of Radiology and the American College of Physicians.3

Which patients can be safely evaluated without imaging?

  • Patients with nonspecific back pain for less than six weeks and normal neurologic examination without high-risk findings can be safely discharged with reassurance and outpatient primary-care follow-up. Patients who are able to identify acute inciting event without direct trauma are much more likely to have musculoskeletal causes of back pain.
  • Patients with back pain and radiculopathy corresponding to L4–L5 or L5–S1 nerve roots (90 percent of disc herniations) are also candidates for outpatient follow-up without ED imaging. A positive straight leg raise is 91 percent sensitive and crossed straight leg raise is 88 percent specific for herniated discs. Patients with signs consistent with lumbar radiculopathy should not routinely undergo MRIs in the ED. While MRI is sensitive for the disc disease, identifying herniated discs doesn’t alter ED management. One study of asymptomatic patients demonstrated that 64 percent had abnormal discs, 52 percent had bulging discs, and 31 percent had disc protrusion!4 MRI is an outpatient preoperative test for patients with persistent symptoms less than six weeks who may be candidates for spinal injections or surgery. Indications for surgery include failure of conservative therapy after four to six weeks and neurologic deficit causing disability.
  • The majority of patients in both groups will improve with conservative management within four to six weeks; emergent imaging does not alter clinical outcomes.

What are the costs of different imaging modalities?

X-ray is neither sensitive nor specific to identify the etiology of acute low-back pain. It is moderately sensitive for traumatic and compression vertebral fractures. Among 20 to 50 year olds, only 1 in 2,500 X-rays leads to a clinically unsuspected diagnosis.6 The median cost of a lumbar-spine X-ray (two or three views) is $71 (range $15 to $371) based on Medicare reimbursement rates, a conservative estimate.

The next time you see a patient with back pain with no high-risk findings, spend a few minutes discussing the diagnosis and plan with the patient.

CT is a more sensitive test for vertebral fractures but is neither sensitive nor specific for spinal-cord disorders, and it has no role in the management of nonspecific back pain or patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The median cost of noncontrast lumbar-spine CT is $174 (range $34 to $1,280) based on Medicare reimbursement rates.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Back PainEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianImaging and UltrasoundPainPatient SafetyTrauma and Injury

Related

  • July 2025 News from the College

    July 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Push-Dose Pressors in the Emergency Department

    June 29, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Authors

Michelle Lin, MD, MPH

Michelle Lin, MD, MPH, is an attending emergency physician and a fellow in the Division of Health Policy Research and Translation in the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. She also serves as an instructor at Harvard Medical School.

View this author's posts »

Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS

Jeremiah D. Schuur, MD, MHS, is vice chair of quality and safety and chief of the Division of Health Policy Research and Translation in the Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston. He also serves as assistant professor at Harvard Medical School.

View this author's posts »

2 Responses to “A High-Value Diagnostic Approach to Low-Back Pain”

  1. July 1, 2015

    ACR Study Finds ER Imaging for Low-Back Pain Appropriate | Advantedge Newsletter Reply

    […] Lin, MD, MPH, Michelle and Schur, MD, MHS, Jeremiah D., “A High Value Diagnostic Approach to Low-Back Pain,” ACEP Now, March 7, […]

  2. July 2, 2015

    ACR Study Finds ER Imaging for Low-Back Pain Appropriate | Emergency Medicine Reply

    […] Lin, MD, MPH, Michelle and Schur, MD, MHS, Jeremiah D., “A High Value Diagnostic Approach to Low-Back Pain,” ACEP Now, March 7, […]

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603