Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Even If Patient Reviews Don’t Correlate With Quality Care, Don’t Ignore Them

By Cedric Dark, MD, MPH, FACEP | on October 21, 2019 | 0 Comment
Policy Rx
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In response to a 2016 article exploring the themes common among Yelp reviews of emergency department visits, critics noted that “satisfaction correlates only weakly with quality.”1 In fact, a 2012 study linked positive patient satisfaction with increased mortality—a dreadful outcome that suggests patient satisfaction itself is not necessarily a patient-centered outcome.2 And while many physicians remain dissatisfied with the comments and scores left by patients on physician-rating sites, executives realize that these reviews might work to drive traffic toward or away from hospitals.

You Might Also Like
  • How Did Your Last Patient Rate You on Yelp?
  • ED Leaders Prepare for Medicare Payment Reforms, Quality-of-Care Improvements
  • Better Clinical Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction Go Hand in Hand for Emergency Physicians
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 10 – October 2019

Multiple studies have discovered the key correlates of patient satisfaction: empathy, wait times, perceived technical skill, pain management, and communication.3,4

In this month’s EMRA+PolicyRx Health Policy Journal Club article, Kirstin Woody Scott, MPhil, PhD, discusses a 2019 article that explored the use of Yelp reviews in comparing the patient experience in emergency departments versus urgent care centers. Spoiler alert: When patients reference the “service” received, we in the emergency department tend to lose.

It pains me to admit that hospitals need to behave more like Disneyland or the Cheesecake Factory, but there must be a reason people keep going back to these places. So what is it that leads some organizations to create an indelible positive memory on their customers while the service we provide often yields negative thoughts?

After four years of medical school and several more years of residency training to perfect our craft, some physicians might consider it insulting that we have to cater to the whims and service expectations of our patients instead of simply providing high-quality care. For others, this has become demoralizing.5 While board certification assures us that the scientific portion of our work is sound, our patients penalize us most when we fail at delivering the more subjective art of medicine.

The art of medicine, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Each patient might want something different—having a great bedside manner, connecting with the patient and all of their companions in the exam room, managing expectations. With each patient encounter, we must create both a technical and aesthetic masterpiece. 


Dr. DarkDr. Dark is assistant professor of emergency medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and executive editor of PolicyRx.org.

References

  1. Ranney ML, Peimer CA. Online emergency department ratings, patient satisfaction, and the age-old issue of communication. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(1):1-2.
  2. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, et al. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405-411.
  3. Welch SJ. Twenty years of patient satisfaction research applied to the emergency department: a qualitative review. Am J Med Quality. 2010;25(1):64-72.
  4. Kilaru AS, Meisel ZF, Paciotti B, et al. What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(1):14-24.
  5. A physician struggles with customer service. Can she still be a good doctor? KevinMD website. Accessed Sept. 19, 2019.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Patient ReviewsPatient SatisfactionPractice ManagementQuality & Safety

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

Cedric Dark, MD, MPH, FACEP

A graduate of Morehouse College, Cedric Dark, MD, MPH, FACEP earned his medical degree from New York University School of Medicine. He holds a master’s degree from the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University. He completed his residency training at George Washington University where he served as chief resident. Currently, Dr. Dark is an associate professor at the Henry J. N. Taub Department of Emergency Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. Dr. Dark is the 2017 recipient of the Texas Medical Association’s C. Frank Webber Award, a 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians Choosing Wisely Champion, the Emergency Medicine Residents’ Association 2021 Joseph F. Waeckerle Alumni of the Year Award, one of emergency medicine’s Top 45 Under 45, and on Elemental’s List of 50 Experts to Trust in a Pandemic. He is currently on the Board of Directors for Doctors for America and the medical editor-in-chief for ACEP Now, the official voice of emergency medicine. .

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Even If Patient Reviews Don’t Correlate With Quality Care, Don’t Ignore Them”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603