Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

EPs Say Sunshine Act Is Good in Theory, but…

By Andy Friedlander ACEP News Contributing Writer | on September 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Tucked away deep within the 2,000-plus pages of the recently upheld Affordable Care Act is a tiny section of the law that could have a sizable impact on emergency physicians.

You Might Also Like
  • Reimbursement and coding updated for 2013
  • Investments in Health IT Will Happen in EDs
  • Nearly 500 EPs Visit Capitol Hill During Conference
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 09 – September 2012

Section 6002 – a mere seven pages – details what is known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, a statute designed to give the public access to information regarding payments made to doctors from manufacturers of drugs, medical devices, and medical supplies through a searchable website.

And that intent is a good one, said ACEP President Dr. David Seaberg. But good intentions don’t guarantee good results.

“Surely the need for transparency is a good concept, especially if [a payment] is significant in value and could sway a physician’s judgment in terms of using drugs or devices,” Dr. Seaberg said. “That’s been shown in the past. But this rule really overreaches in terms of the bureaucracy it will create. It’s going to present a real problem for physicians.

“It’s a real bureaucratic overreach in what they’re trying to do. The basic concept is good, but this particular ‘sunshine rule’ is not where it should be.”

Exactly how the law will work is still something of a mystery. At press time, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) still had not released a final version, and it has postponed the collection of data until at least the beginning of 2013.

One thing that is known, however, is that the threshold for reporting payments or gifts is a mere $10 ($100 per payer during the calendar year).

As ridiculous as that sounds – “Two lattes and you’re up to 10 bucks,” ACEP Federal Affairs Director Barbara Tomar said – it’s written into the statute itself and is not open to interpretation by CMS.

And that, Dr. Seaberg and Ms. Tomar said, could quickly become problematic even though the physicians are not required to report anything themselves.

ACEP is trying to help members stay one step ahead by collecting their National Provider Identifier (NPI) numbers at this year’s Scientific Assembly held Oct. 8-11 in Denver. Providing NPIs to health care service providers, device manufacturers, and pharmaceutical companies puts the burden of making the reports on those companies giving the cash, stock, or in-kind items or services.

However, physicians also will need to keep their own detailed and accurate records in order to be able to dispute any erroneous reports. With such a low threshold, those records will be many.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth Care ReformHealth InsurancePolitics

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • VACEP Legal Victory Illustrates Why the Prudent Layperson Standard Still Matters

    October 26, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • “If Not Me, Then Who?”

    March 16, 2022 - 4 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “EPs Say Sunshine Act Is Good in Theory, but…”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603