Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Care Exempted From Balance Billing Ban

By Christie L. Carter, ACEP News Contributing Writer | on June 1, 2011 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The fraying safety net of emergency medicine received a reprieve recently, largely due to several ACEP members who acted on behalf of all emergency physicians to ensure that controversial model legislation did not further diminish emergency care reimbursement. In early March, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) passed a model law to enhance health care transparency in relation to controversial balance billing practices.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Approves Fair Payment / Balance Billing Policies
  • Opinion: Emergency Physicians Should Work On Solutions to Balance Billing Issues
  • ACEP President Dr. Jay Kaplan Outlines Key Points on Balance Billing in Becker’s Hospital Review
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 30 – No 06 – June 2011

NCOIL’s model legislation initially prohibited balance billing, but ACEP worked with such entities as the Emergency Department Practice Management Association (EDPMA) and the American Medical Association to challenge the proposed bill. Their efforts paid off, and the model bill that NCOIL released in March ultimately focused on notification requirements for hospitals and insurers to inform patients when they may be treated for nonemergency conditions by an out-of-network physician in an in-network hospital. Emergency care was specifically exempted from all notification requirements in the model bill, which was distributed as a model to legislators in every state.

Dr. Charles Bregier Jr., immediate past chair of ACEP’s Reimbursement Committee, testified before NCOIL regarding the dire effect that a blanket prohibition against balance billing or a pretreatment disclosure mandate could have on emergency care providers and their patients.

“We didn’t think the whole issue of disclosure and transparency was appropriate in an emergency department setting,” said Dr. Bregier. “If we’re in a situation where we or a hospital representative must talk about being a nonparticipating provider when someone’s having a heart attack, patients will die.”

Dr. Michael Gerardi, a member of ACEP’s Board of Directors and liaison to ACEP’s Reimbursement Committee, testified before NCOIL that emergency care providers have been forced to balance bill because insurance companies are severely underpaying these out-of-network claims.

“Knowing that emergency providers will take care of patients no matter what (because of EMTALA), some insurers aren’t living up to their obligations,” said Dr. Gerardi. “In reality, a ban on balance billing would be a huge benefit to insurers, giving them carte blanche to arbitrarily set payments rates for emergency physicians – and all of this at a time when the ED safety net is already unraveling.”

Such legislation banning balance billing would also put patients’ lives at risk because the ban would have included emergency care consultants, such as anesthesiologists, radiologists, and cardiologists.

“If you tell a plastic surgeon or an orthopedist that they can’t balance bill, who is going to be willing to take call?” Dr. Gerardi said.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCharityCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth Care ReformPoliticsReimbursement and Coding

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • VACEP Legal Victory Illustrates Why the Prudent Layperson Standard Still Matters

    October 26, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • “If Not Me, Then Who?”

    March 16, 2022 - 4 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Emergency Care Exempted From Balance Billing Ban”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603