Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ED Boarding

By Nishad A. Rahman, MD; Keith C. Hemmert, MD; and Jesse M. Pines, MD, MBA, MSCE | on August 1, 2023 | 1 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Solution 2: Unload the nursing workforce of less complex tasks by allowing related professionals to increase their scope of practice

You Might Also Like
  • From the Editor: the Boarding Crisis
  • The Power of Your Boarding Crisis Stories
  • Washington Chapter ACEP Brings Fight Against Psychiatric Boarding to the Courts
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 08 – August 2023

To reduce crowding, the central issue hospitals need to address is a shortage of nursing labor. Allowing some lower-level tasks performed by nurses to be completed by related professionals would rapidly address the issue. An immediate step would be the federal government working from the top down with local regulatory bodies to adopt new scopes of practice for workers and delegate some, less complex, currently nurse-only, tasks to others. For example, EMS personnel, certified nursing assistants, and medical assistants could reduce the nursing work burden for tasks such as drawing blood, hanging simple fluids, placing IVs, and other tasks. This would involve partnering with groups like the American Nurses Association or the Emergency Nurses Association to develop programs for nurse extenders. ED physicians lead teams of advanced practice clinicians in some hospitals. Similarly, nurses could lead their own teams with these new roles. Some hospitals have already embraced the concept of nursing extenders.8 Additionally, military branches have skilled workers with complementary skills where an existing workforce could be immediately deployed to meet these needs. Navy corpsmen deliver a wide range of nursing-related tasks in U.S. military facilities. Another idea would be to expand the National Health Services Corps to include graduating high school seniors who could serve in these novel roles for two years, gaining skills and loan forgiveness for college or trade school.

Solution 3: Fund EDs and hospitals to address hospital crowding and ED boarding

With direct funding from the federal government, there would be additional resources to address local issues, customized to hospital needs. Such uses of funds could include hiring ancillary staff to offset nursing tasks, which would address the staff shortages that have caused many hospitals to close available, but now empty, beds. These bed closures directly worsen boarding because there are fewer spaces to send ED patients after hospital admission. Those beds need to reopen. Funding could also be directed further downstream to post-acute facilities where decreases in bed availability have caused upstream congestion in hospitals, also leading to ED boarding.

Alternatively, funding could be deployed to provide resources to internal hospital teams to address remediable flow issues. Funds could be used to hire additional physicians or advanced practice clinicians to augment clinical gaps, or to provide leadership. Such funding would create an imperative for hospitals to focus on ED boarding with additional dedicated human resources at a time when hospital budgets are strained. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Boarding

Related

  • Opinion: Demand Up, Beds Down—The Emergency Dept. Crowding Crisis

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Dr. Joe Sachs and “The Pitt” Are Redefining Public Health Education Through Storytelling

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

One Response to “ED Boarding”

  1. August 22, 2023

    Christian Tomaszewski Reply

    Great suggestions in your five recommendations.

    Unfortunately, in California #2 and #3 (offsetting nursing tasks) do not really work. The bottleneck is the nursing ratio (4:1, except ICU cases 2:1). You can hire all the LVNs and techs you want; we cannot violate that ratio. And for some reason, waiting room patients do not count in the ratio, and so get “ignored.” We need waivers for ratios, on both the inpatient and ED sides to cope with the volume, provided we do give nurses help with such “care extenders.”

    As for #5, yes, ED physicians need to engage with population health. But decreasing overall ED volume is not necessarily the answer. The worried well to some extent subsidize ED operations. We could certainly accommodate many more Level 3/4 triage patients (treat and discharge) if we were not holding so many admissions in the ED, which lengthens every ED patient’s workup and stay.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603