Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Documentation Pearls for Compiling a Complete Review of Systems

By DAVID FRIEDENSON, MD, FACEP, AND HAMILTON LEMPERT, MD, FACEP, CEDC | on October 13, 2016 | 0 Comment
Coding Wizard
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Coding Wizard

Editor’s Note: Cutting through the red tape to make certain that you get paid for every dollar you earn has become more difficult than ever, particularly in our current climate of health care reform and ICD-10 transition.

You Might Also Like
  • Documentation Pearls for Pitfalls in the Physical Exam
  • Documentation Pearls for Coding Lacerations
  • Documentation Pearls for Critical Care Services’ Time Requirement
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 35 – No 10 – October 2016

The ACEP Coding and Nomenclature Committee has partnered with ACEP Now to provide you with practical, impactful tips to help you navigate through this coding and reimbursement maze.

Question: What’s considered a “complete” review of systems (ROS)?

Answer: Per the 1995 Medicare documentation guidelines, 10 systems, including pertinent positives and negatives, constitute a complete review of systems, which is required for Level 5 (99285) visits. If you review all the systems with the patient and document the pertinent positives and negatives, you may use statements such as, “Complete review of systems is negative except as noted above,” or “All systems negative except as noted above.”

Some payers deviate from the guidelines and may require 10 individual systems to be documented, while others don’t accept statements such as “A 10-system review was completed and was negative,” as they feel that there is no indication of which 10 systems were reviewed. Be wary of some EHR systems, as they may group responses to the ROS, making it seem like you’re getting to 10 when you actually have only eight or nine.

These are the officially recognized systems:

  • Constitutional (eg, fever, weight loss)
  • Eyes
  • Ears, Nose, Throat, Mouth
  • Cardiovascular
  • Respiratory
  • Gastrointestinal
  • Genitourinary
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Integument (skin and/or breast)
  • Neurological
  • Psychiatric
  • Endocrine
  • Hematologic/Lymphatic
  • Allergy/Immunology

Brought to you by the ACEP Coding and Nomenclature Committee.


DR. FRIEDENSON is the chief medical officer of Reventics, a coding, RCM and provider engagement company, and president of ACEP’s Colorado Chapter. He practices emergency medicine in Thornton, Colorado, and educates physicians on a variety of documentation topics. DR. LEMPERT is chief medical officer, health care financial services, at Knoxville, Tennessee-based TeamHealth.

Topics: BillingElectronic Health RecordEmergency DepartmentEmergency PhysicianPatient CarePractice ManagementReimbursement & CodingReview of Systems

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Documentation Pearls for Compiling a Complete Review of Systems”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603