Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

D2B time: Are we measuring the right thing?

By Salim Rezaie, M.D. | on October 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Door-to-balloon (D2B) time is a measurement that starts with patient arrival to the emergency department (door) and ends when a catheter crosses a culprit lesion in the cardiac cath lab (balloon). The benefit of prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention over thrombolytic therapy for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction is very well established. Because of this “time is muscle” strategy, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) launched a national Door to Balloon (D2B) initiative in November 2006. The purpose of this was to recommend a D2B time of no more than 90 minutes. Currently, there is quite a bit of effort put into this guideline by cardiology and emergency medicine, but are we measuring the right thing?

You Might Also Like
  • Improved Stroke-Thrombolysis Times Seen with Regional Learning Collaboratives
  • STEMI Treatment and ‘Mission: Lifeline’
  • Stroke in Pregnancy
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 10 – October 2013

What are some proven strategies that do help reduce D2B time?

(Based on 365 surveyed hospitals)

  • ED physician activated the cath lab: 8.2 min reduction in D2B time
  • Single call activation system to activate the cath lab: 13.8 min
  • Prehospital ECG activation of cath lab: 15.4 min
  • Cath lab team is available within 20 min of being paged: 19.3 min
  • Attending cardiologist always on site: 14.6 min
  • Prompt data feedback between EM and Cardiology staff: 8.6 min

Does D2B time decrease significantly if multiple strategies are used?

(365 surveyed hospitals)

  • 0 strategies = avg D2B time 110 min
  • 1 strategy = avg D2B time 100 min
  • 2 strategies = avg D2B time 88 min
  • 3 strategies = avg D2B time 88 min
  • 4 strategies = avg D2B time 79 min

So if the above strategies are evidence based, have been shown to reduce D2B times, and “time is muscle,” then this should be standard of care, right? Currently, D2B times of 90 minutes or less (Class I recommendation) have become a performance measure and the focus of regional/national quality improvement initiatives. More importantly, does this measure reduce morbidity/mortality? Recently, in the September 2013 NEJM2 a retrospective, observational study looked at this exact question.

How large was this NEJM study?

  • 95,007 patients accounted for 96,738 admissions for primary PCI of STEMI
  • 515 hospitals participating in the CathPCI Registry

Conclusion: The study was very large

How long were the D2B times in this study?

  • 2005 – 2006 mean D2B time 83 minutes
  • 2008 – 2009 mean D2B time 67 minutes

There was an increase from 59.7% to 83.1% of patients having D2B times less than or equal to 90 minutes over the course of the study.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: BloggEDCardiovascularCritical CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEvidence-based MedicineProcedures and Skills

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Navigating Strict State Abortion Laws

    January 5, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage: A Three-Pronged Approach

    January 5, 2025 - 3 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “D2B time: Are we measuring the right thing?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603