Logo

Latest News

  • Antibiotics Provide No Added Benefit in Severe Asthma Flares
  • Rising Readmission Rates for Children with Complex Chronic Conditions
Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Practice Management
    • Benchmarking
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Care Team
    • Legal
    • Operations
    • Quality & Safety
  • Public Policy
    • Advocacy
    • Health Reform
    • Medicare & Medicaid
    • Regulation
  • Technology
    • EMR
    • Health IT
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Innovation
  • Career
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • CASTED
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • The Feed
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Myths in Emergency Medicine
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
      • Roundtable
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Tricks of the Trade
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • Wellness
    • What I Wish I Knew
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
    • Multimedia
    • Events
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
    • EM Career Central
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Authors
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Communication Tips for Reaching Your Opioid-Addicted Patients

By R. Corey Waller MD, MS, FACEP, DFASAM; and Evan Schwarz, MD, FACEP, FACMT | on April 13, 2018 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
Understanding the Biology of Addiction Might Improve Emergency Care of Patients Who Abuse Opioids

Editor’s Note: This is the second part of an ongoing series on what emergency physicians can do to combat the opioid epidemic. The series will continue in the June issue.

You’re in the midst of a busy shift trying to balance multiple patients when a nurse suddenly grabs you for an unconscious 30-year-old male pulled from a car with agonal respirations. You begin to bag him while ordering a dose of intramuscular naloxone. Within minutes, the patient starts to breathe, sits up confused, and tries to get off the gurney. Before you can blink, someone tells him, “Lay back down, and by the way, you’re welcome for saving your life.” The situation deteriorates, and both you and the patient leave the encounter dissatisfied, to put it mildly. Later you wonder if things could have played out differently.

It’s probably fair to say we’ve all experienced a similar encounter. Instead of receiving an appreciative “thank you” and plugging the patient into treatment, it ends with yelling and the patient suddenly walking out while you wonder if it’s safe for them to do so. There are many reasons these encounters go poorly. The patient may be scared or embarrassed, be afraid from previous encounters in which he felt disrespected, be in withdrawal from the naloxone, or have a poorly controlled mental illness. We might make incorrect assumptions about the patient’s ability to hear what we are telling them. Sometimes we think we are helping but may be making things worse. Of course, some people are just difficult, but this is true of patients with and without a substance-use disorder.

Are They Motivated?

It’s easy to assume a near-death encounter would motivate patients to change. But if overcoming addiction were this “easy,” no one would ever need a second dose of naloxone. How many times have you thought, after something bad occurs, that it’s time to make a change? Maybe after a bad traffic accident or near miss, you tell yourself you will never speed again, but then you do speed again.

As it turns out, there are several change stages, including pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. People move back and forth among these stages during their lifetime and don’t always progress in a linear fashion. Unfortunately, nearly dying does not always move someone with an opioid-use disorder to the action phase no matter how much we’d like it to.

As such, we must meet the person where they are. If they are ready to change, great! If there are resources available for treatment, hand them over and encourage them to follow up. But if they aren’t, us pushing remains unlikely to move them, and a change of approach may prove necessary. Otherwise, you’ll be pounding a square peg into a round hole.

Roll with It

In addition to the message, consider how you deliver it. In our emergency department, most of the time we’re overworked, overtired, and overstressed. As such, we try to be concise and to the point. We doubt we’re the only ones who have told a patient, “You will get HIV and die if you don’t stop using,” and then sometimes become upset or annoyed when they blankly stare at us. This used to be how addiction specialists would speak with them also, until they figured out this approach doesn’t work.

Pages: 1 2 3 Single Page

Topics: Emergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency Physiciansopioid addictionOpioid CrisisPain and Palliative Care

Related

  • Myths in EM: The Anti-Inflammatory Properties of NSAIDs

    January 14, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Five Steps to Help You Manage Opioid Use Disorder Patients

    January 14, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Medication-Assisted Therapy Is More Than Just Buprenorphine

    January 14, 2019 - 0 Comment

Most Popular

No Responses to “Communication Tips for Reaching Your Opioid-Addicted Patients”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Current Issue

ACEP February 2019

ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 02 – February 2019

Read More

More from this issue

  • Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment: Bring Back Phenobarbital?

  • How Is ACEP Directly Affecting Your Practice?

  • Do-Not-Resuscitate Tattoos: Are They Valid?

  • Myths in Emergency Medicine: Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiograms as Imaging Standard, and Radiographs for Pelvic Trauma

    Data Suggests Lactated Ringer’s Is Better than Normal Saline

  • Presenters at the ACEP17 Research Forum.

    Highlights from the ACEP17 Research Forum

  • How to Spot and Help Human Trafficking Victims in the Emergency Department

  • Safe Discharge in Non-Low Risk Chest Pain Patients

    Safe Discharge in Non-Low Risk Chest Pain Patients

  • ILLUSTRATINON: Peter Gardiner/Science Source

    Tips to Improve Airway Management

  • Today's ACEP Board Is Its Most Diverse Ever

    Today’s ACEP Board Is Its Most Diverse Ever

  • Dr. Bensen Helped Break through the ACEP Board’s Glass Ceiling

  • Opinion: Stanford’s New Stroke Protocol Expands the Treatment Window

  • How to Receive Student Loan Forgiveness

Polls

With regard to state legislative activity regulating the opioid prescribing practices of emergency physicians, which of the following wouId you support? Check all that apply.

  • Restrictions on duration (36%, 229 Votes)
  • Restrictions of quantity (34%, 219 Votes)
  • Mandatory checking of prescription drug monitoring systems for all opioid prescriptions from the ED (30%, 194 Votes)

Total Voters: 367

Polls results not statistically significant.
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Advertise
© 2019. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2333-2603
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.