Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP’s Expert Witness, Ethical Policies Should Be Enforced

By ACEP Now | on November 18, 2014 | 0 Comment
Break Room
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As the article [“Do We Need a New Standard of Proof in Medical Malpractice Cases?” Sept. 2014] points out, a higher standard of proof is a partial solution to the problem of marginal and spurious malpractice claims. However, as is also clearly shown, this standard can be completely subverted when “expert witnesses” ignore the standard and mislead juries by misinterpreting it in order to service their clients.

You Might Also Like
  • The EP in the Courtroom: Expert Witness Testimony
  • We have met the enemy (Part II)
  • ACEP Issues Public Censure Against Dr. Peter Rosen for Violating Ethics Code, Expert Witness Guidelines
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 11 – November 2014

ACEP has crafted excellent expert witness policies and related ethics policies to address the problem of unethical testimony by members. However, the policies are not well-publicized and are largely ignored.

For example, renewal of membership used to carry with it an explicit promise to uphold the ethical standards of the College, including those related to expert witness testimony. Now the renewal document is simply a bill.

We have yet to provide any educational courses or materials for members on what constitutes ethical medical expert testimony. I have taught such courses in other medical specialty societies, which do deem it to be important. Our members have told us they would appreciate some guidance, and we know that many do testify.

Although we have excellent procedures in place to pursue unethical experts among our members and to clarify the actual standard of care, these are rarely utilized. (I am hopeful they may be in the cited case.)

But if the problem of unethical experts from within our own ranks were not enough, we in EM are uniquely vulnerable to “experts” from other specialties who believe that they know our standard from what they may remember in an ED rotation in medical school or residency, or from what they glean as consultants to us, or they simply testify convincingly that the standard in their own specialty is the same as in ours.

It is obvious that we could do more to address this problem than simply to rail against it.

–Louise B. Andrew, MD, JD, FACEP, FIFEM
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEthicsLegalMalpracticeTestimony

Related

  • Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Life-Sustaining Therapy

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Evidence for Empathy in the Emergency Department

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP’s Expert Witness, Ethical Policies Should Be Enforced”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603