Logo

Latest News

  • E-scooter Injuries Rising, Often Involve Drugs or Alcohol
  • Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Tied to Higher Cancer Risk in Kids
Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Practice Management
    • Benchmarking
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Care Team
    • Legal
    • Operations
    • Quality & Safety
  • Public Policy
    • Advocacy
    • Health Reform
    • Medicare & Medicaid
    • Regulation
  • Technology
    • EMR
    • Health IT
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Innovation
  • Career
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Opinion
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Multimedia
    • Events
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
    • EM Career Central
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Authors
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Sues Insurer for Retroactive Denials of Emergency Department Visits

By Laura Wooster, MPH; and Leslie Patterson Moore, JD | on September 19, 2018 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
ILLUSTRATION: Chris Whissen PHOTOS: shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Defending “Prudent Layperson” in Court
  • ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices
  • ACEP Battles Anthem BlueCross BlueShield Policy That Jeopardizes Prudent Layperson Standard
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 09 – September 2018

ILLUSTRATION: Chris Whissen PHOTOS: shutterstock.com

In its escalating fight against Anthem BlueCross BlueShield’s dangerous policy of retroactive denials of ED visits the insurer deems as “non-emergent,” ACEP has taken legal action. Joined by the Medical Association of Georgia, ACEP filed a lawsuit against Anthem’s BlueCross BlueShield of Georgia in July 2018 in federal court.

This action follows a yearlong effort by ACEP to protect the prudent layperson standard on behalf of its members and fight back against the policy that Anthem currently is enforcing in six states. These efforts have yielded significant progress: Anthem announced in February that it was expanding the “always pay exceptions” on the denials policy and would request a medical record for every potential denial; The New York Times ran a story on reactions to Anthem’s policy that featured data contributed by ACEP on denials in each state the policy was implemented in; and most recently, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) published a report on the Anthem issue for which ACEP also contributed information.

But even with Anthem’s changes to the policy, lives are still being endangered merely by its continued existence. Anthem policyholders are still being told by the insurer to “save the ER for emergencies, or you’ll be responsible for the cost.” Yet, as we all know, it is often impossible for emergency physicians, much less patients, to know based on a patient’s initial symptoms whether their condition will ultimately end up being emergent. Therefore, since Anthem continues to force patients to second-guess the decision to seek emergency care, ACEP and its leadership determined that further action was needed.

ACEP’s lawsuit asserts that Anthem’s policy violates the prudent layperson standard, which requires insurance companies to cover the costs of emergency department visits based on a patient’s symptoms and not the final diagnosis. Further, because the policy discriminates against those in protected classes, who utilize emergency departments more frequently and are disproportionally impacted by the financial stress created by having their claims denied, Anthem is also being sued for a violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The lawsuit requests the court grant an injunction preventing Anthem from enforcing its destructive denial policy or retroactively denying benefits.

Stopping Anthem’s retroactive ED denials policy with this lawsuit is critical to protecting the prudent layperson standard and working to ensure other payers do not follow with their own similar dangerous policies. ACEP is currently also fighting back against BlueCross BlueShield of Texas’ new policy to deny coverage for its HMO patients who seek care for what it deems as non-emergent conditions at an out-of-network facility, as well as Medicaid managed care plans and state waiver applications that also erode the prudent layperson standard. ACEP continues to engage in efforts with federal policymakers to strengthen that standard and ensure it is appropriately enforced, as required under federal law.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: AnthemBlueCross BlueShieldInsurancePrudent Laypersonretroactive denials

Related

  • Opinion: Single Payer Health Care’s Time Has Come

    October 21, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Opinion: Single Payer Health Care Would Be Detrimental to Emergency Physicians

    October 21, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Medicare-for-All Might Not Cause Surge in Hospital Use

    July 29, 2019 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP_1119_cover-image

ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 11 – November 2019

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP Sues Insurer for Retroactive Denials of Emergency Department Visits”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
© 2019. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2333-2603
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.