Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Responds to Texas Ruling on ABPS—Certification Decision Questioned

By ACEP Now | on January 1, 2010 | 1 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

It is important to distinguish our position on board certification from our position on ACEP’s legacy physicians. ACEP was founded more than 40 years ago when residency training in emergency medicine was not available. The physicians who founded the specialty, and many who came after them, did not have the opportunity to attend a residency or become board certified.

You Might Also Like
  • 2012 Subspecialty Application Cycles and Certification Exams
  • ACEP Leadership Working to Change Maintenance of Certification Requirements and More
  • Texas Holds Strategy for Chapter Membership Growth
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 01 – January 2010

These “legacy” physicians remain a critical component of the emergency medicine workforce. They are also vital contributors to the success of America’s emergency care system, and they will remain so for many more years.

Our position on BCEM pertains to the important role of residency training today. BCEM certification provides equivalent recognition to new physicians who simply choose not to seek residency training in emergency medicine.

Allowing new physicians without emergency medicine residency training to advertise themselves as board certified in emergency medicine would dilute and de-emphasize the critical importance of residency training.

It also misrepresents to the public the level of training these new physicians have received.

Therefore, ACEP continues to oppose efforts to allow BCEM-certified physicians to advertise themselves as board certified.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPACEP Board of DirectorsAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCertificationEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPractice TrendsPublic PolicyResident

Related

  • ACEP Now Interviews ABEM President Dr. Diane Gorgas

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • February 2025 News from the College

    February 11, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

One Response to “ACEP Responds to Texas Ruling on ABPS—Certification Decision Questioned”

  1. July 7, 2018

    William T Gatewood DO Reply

    As EM becomes more competitive and the amount of EM applicants increase each year there, there is a shortage of options when it comes to additional training. Ideally, an applicant will Match into an EM training program, complete residency and obtain board certification through ABEM/AOBEM

    But there are also a significant amount of applicants who do not Match into EM and take positions in other specialties. With each year that passes, the likelihood of securing an EM residency spot diminishes significantly. The main driver being “Above the Cap GME Funding” for residents with prior training.

    There are few other options available to these residents, who have not given up on their goals to work as EM physician. A majority of rural EDs are staffed by non-ABEM BC physicians. Is this ideal? I don’t believe so.

    The American Board of Physician Specialists offer this niche of residents to seek additional EM training and if eligible, sit for both oral and written examinations to become Board Certifed Emergency Medicine (BCEM). I understand and respect the ABEMs position whether this alternative “Board Certification” meets the same muster and continuing accreditation the ABEM works for. ABEM/AOBEM Board Certification = Gold Standard

    But for those EM applicants who didn’t match and the truly dedicated residents who would gladly complete an additional residency in EM if given the chance, what other options do they have? There is no easy answer.

    With the addition of each new medical school and future ACGME single-accreditation for graduate medical education, there will only be more graduating residents applying for a limited number of EM positions. And thus my plight.

    With all due respect, the physicians who seek additional training, such as an ABPS EM Fellowship are truly dedicated to the advancement of their knowledge and commitment to patient care. At the end of the day, we get out of our training what we put into our training.

    Until there is another option for continued training in EM, options like BCEM at least provide some contingency to those residents who have gotten “too old” in PGY years to realistically transfer or even Re-Match into EM.

    I am one of those residents and unless I Re-Match into EM this season (having completed an ACGME Family Medicine residency by July 1st, 2019), this pathway at least gets me a little bit closer to my goal of working in academic EM and residency training.

    Thank you for the opportunity to engage in this conversation. If anything, I wish others to learn from my experience and be successful…the first time, matching into the specialty we hold such high in respect.

    Respectfully,
    William Gatewood DO

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603