Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

By ACEP Now | on April 10, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP-Supported Issues, Bills at the 2014 Leadership and Advocacy Conference
  • Tort Protections For Emergency Docs Part of Bill Passed by House – Liability Reform Goes to Senate
  • Influence on the clinical practice of emergency medicine
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 04 – April 2014

After thinking about this, and I do appreciate Kevin’s insight as well as Laura’s and the rest of the staff’s, what about the simple strategy of stating that ACEP has developed five proposed safe harbors and then submitting those to the media? We would certainly need Laura to craft a great message about how safe harbors are the right thing to do, and we let the other people shoot them down. The worst thing that could happen is that ACEP was proposing cost-saving measures that benefit patients and eliminate unnecessary tests. I think it might be hard politically for ATLA and even consumer groups to say that safe harbor should not exist, particularly if we pick something very simple and straightforward. Emergency physicians determine the standard of care, and there’s no reason why we should not be able to determine what safe harbors should exist in our field. If we can determine what is unethical and egregious testimony, certainly we should be able to agree on some straightforward, simple safe harbors. Jay [Kaplan’s] list and some of our Choosing Wisely submissions might be a good start, but I’d like to do something with chest pain and POLST [Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment]. I don’t think we do need to make this too complicated. Legislation will take forever and get bogged down, and if it gets close, they may even filibuster it.

—Paul D. Kivela, MD, FACEP, ACEP Secretary-Treasurer


Maybe not safe harbors, but could we have more transparency around what following the guidelines means in terms of risk? For instance, following PECARN [the Pediatric Applied Research Network Head Injury/Trauma Algorithm], 1 in 2,000 kids will have clinically significant traumatic brain injury that will not have been CT’d initially. The “cost” of trying to be perfect is the cost of 1,999 CTs and the subsequent radiation exposure versus the cost of defense/settlement/verdict for the one “miss.”

—William Jaquis, MD, FACEP, ACEP Board Member


Bill,

Excellent points. I think an important educational point for the layperson is that reducing utilization and cost is the right thing to do, but there are two sides of the equation. Albeit a small percentage, some patients who are exempted by the guideline will have a bad outcome due to missed or delayed diagnoses from not ordering the test. When looking at population data, most, if not all, agree that this is the right thing to do. However, applying this to the individual patient encounter is a very different application of the concept. In other words, most laypersons agree this is the right thing to do. However, their opinions may change when they personally will not receive the test and particularly if they ultimately suffer a bad outcome.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPClinical GuidelineCommentaryEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLegalPublic PolicyRoundtable

Related

  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603