Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

By ACEP Now | on April 10, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

I agree with everyone that firing back in our own defense is most likely to be perceived as self-preservation. However, I would like for such an article to spark an ACEP-led debate on shared decision making. Serving our patients is always the best road to travel. In addition, shared decision making, in my opinion, functions as a bedside safe harbor. I avoid the provision of more unnecessary tests in this way and serve my patients better while also reducing my liability by informed discussions and documenting patient preferences.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP-Supported Issues, Bills at the 2014 Leadership and Advocacy Conference
  • Tort Protections For Emergency Docs Part of Bill Passed by House – Liability Reform Goes to Senate
  • Influence on the clinical practice of emergency medicine
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 04 – April 2014

I included this concept in a chapter in the new edition of Jim Adam’s management text, Emergency Medicine: Clinical Essentials, 2nd ed.

I have considered addressing this concept in ACEP Now. Following this article, I’m certain that I will.

Thank you.

—Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP, ACEP Council Speaker


Alex, I like [ACEP public relations director Laura Gore’s] opinion. Editorial boards will want to know what we intend to discuss that is new. At root, this remains an argument we have been making for years. Defensive medicine is an expensive and unnecessary part of medical practice that does not benefit patients. But doctors have to do it because of the unreasonable and out-of-control liability environment. Advocating for safe harbors for practicing evidence-based medicine (which is cheaper for society and better for patients), and thereby allowing doctors to be exempt from medical liability if there is the unexpected bad outcome, is not a new concept. Insurers and hospitals will support it along with doctors, but trial lawyers, some consumer groups, and many Democrats will fight it to the death. We can try to get meetings and be more proactive and raise our voice on this, but I think Kevin Klauer’s analysis is correct. Unless there is legislation, or perhaps some hardwired regulation, establishing the safe harbor, it will not be a true safe harbor insulating from liability. Without the legislative or regulatory underpinning, ACEP can say what is the standard of care, but it will then be litigated in each case. I think we might want to get some legal advice from [former CMS administrator and ACA regulatory law expert] Tom Scully’s firm or [association and health care law expert] Rob Portman on any angle there may be for us to truly establish safe harbors either through legislation or regulation under the ACA.

—Dean Wilkerson, JD, MBA, CAE, ACEP Executive Director

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPClinical GuidelineCommentaryEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLegalPublic PolicyRoundtable

Related

  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603