Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

By ACEP Now | on April 10, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

—Andrew E. Sama, MD, FACEP, ACEP Chair of the Board and Immediate Past President

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP-Supported Issues, Bills at the 2014 Leadership and Advocacy Conference
  • Tort Protections For Emergency Docs Part of Bill Passed by House – Liability Reform Goes to Senate
  • Influence on the clinical practice of emergency medicine
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 04 – April 2014

ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines

I think it would be interesting to pose this question to the trial attorneys whether the Choosing Wisely recommendations constitute safe harbors. Let’s have somebody else debate this issue rather than us trying to make a statement that may appear to be self-serving. I wonder what the president of ATLA [the Association of Trial Lawyers of America] would say.

—Paul D. Kivela, MD, FACEP, ACEP Secretary-Treasurer


As per my reply to Dean, this is all about risk benefit continuum or spectrum—in other words, how much certainty for how many dollars cost for the patient and how much risk for doing or not doing the test or procedure, which entails health risk for the patient and medical liability and career risk for the physician.

Medical liability must be addressed. Agree with Sama, a letter to the editor that clarifies that issue would be appropriate.

—Alexander M. Rosenau, DO, FACEP, ACEP President


Let’s move forward and try something different. Let’s establish safe harbors and advertise that this will save waste from the system … Safe harbors to improve patient safety and decrease health care costs.

— ACEP Secretary-Treasurer Paul D. Kivela, MD, FACEP

My question is perhaps a philosophical one. It doesn’t seem to matter if it’s right or if it’s wrong but how it is perceived. So why do we continue to self-advocate as it rarely seems to be effective in changing public opinion? I think we need to go and try something different from time to time. It seems like we are writing too many letters to editors to clarify misperceptions.

I would rather have articles written in our favor the first time around. What about pitching this to the LA Times if not The Wall Street Journal and having them ask the trial attorneys how they feel about safe harbors for Choosing Wisely measures. For balance, they can ask the insurance companies and the regulators.

—Paul D. Kivela, MD, FACEP, ACEP Secretary-Treasurer


Think Paul has struck a nerve.

Recently, an ACEP leader gave a talk about “What I learned in Washington.” It was illuminating. He says no one cares what we think. If we say it, then it is automatically seen as being self-serving and not to be trusted. [Politicians] want recommendations and data from impartial sources.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPClinical GuidelineCommentaryEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLegalPublic PolicyRoundtable

Related

  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “ACEP Reacts to Issue of Creating Safe Harbor Protections for Following Clinical Guidelines”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603