Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Does a 10-Item Physical Exam Add Value to Patient Care?

By Shari Welch, MD, FACEP | on February 13, 2014 | 1 Comment
Special OPs
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Does a 10-Item Physical Exam Add Value to Patient Care

Why a general health check may become obsolete

You Might Also Like
  • Physical Exam in Patient Care Not Only Practice Threatened as Role of Emergency Physicians Evolves
  • Physical Exam Critical to Rule Out Unnecessary Lab Tests
  • Documentation Pearls for Pitfalls in the Physical Exam
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 02 – February 2014

As every emergency physician knows, the practical exam required to provide perfect care to patients is very different than that required to effectively bill a chart. The money depends on a well-rehearsed and complex labyrinthine system of paperwork and documentation. Following national guidelines and individual expertise, evidence-based care can be rendered to complex patients; the rate-limiting factor for reimbursement resides in the documentation of an exhaustive history and physical examination. For complex patients, a 10-item physical exam is required for full reimbursement. But does this really add value to the care of the individual patient? In the context of increasingly quality-minded health care reform, is this practice outdated and misaligned with contemporary goals?

There is currently an evolving and growing body of research to suggest that the death of the general physical exam might be afoot. If you forgot your stethoscope, could you make it through your shift? Many could. How often do the physical examination findings we document actually change management? Doesn’t a problem-focused history get us 99 percent of the way in 99 percent of the patients?

A recent meta-analysis by Cochrane Reviews looked at research correlating the comprehensive general physical exam with outcomes.1 General health checks were defined as screening examinations for multiple conditions, not just one particular disease state. (This is effectively what our existing documentation and coding guidelines require of the emergency physician for reimbursement.) A number of general findings are worth noting:

  • The general health examination for adults (between 18 and 65 years of age) was not associated with improved overall mortality rates nor improved disease-specific mortality rates.
  • General physical examinations did not improve the risk for major health events, such as myocardial infarctions.
  • There were little data on whether the general physical examination correlated with utilization of health resources.

The authors concluded that the general physical examination among adults should focus on specific evidence-based goals of preventive medicine, not on broad system reviews and general physical examinations looking for potential disease.

Patients have expectations. They are seeking an intimate relationship with their health care providers and crave the “magical hands” that will find health care problems and restore health, which is in direct conflict with the value of the exam they expect.

Other studies have begun to create a body of knowledge that suggests the physical examination is simply obsolete. Since 1975, the contribution of the physical examination has been called into question. An article in the British Medical Journal found that the physical exam contributed to the final diagnosis in fewer than 10 percent of outpatient visits.2 In 1992, a study in the Western Journal of Medicine using similar methodology found that the general physical exam contributed to the diagnosis in only 12 percent of outpatients.3

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: BillingCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianOperationsPractice ManagementPractice TrendsProcedures and SkillsQualityReimbursement and Coding

Related

  • Scripps Mercy Hospital San Diego’s Unique ED Culture Breeds Innovation

    July 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Emergency Physicians Can Thrive in Value-Based Care Landscapes

    June 24, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Opinion: Demand Up, Beds Down—The Emergency Dept. Crowding Crisis

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Shari Welch, MD, FACEP

Shari Welch, MD, FACEP, is a practicing emergency physician with Utah Emergency Physicians and a research fellow at the Intermountain Institute for Health Care Delivery Research. She has written numerous articles and three books on ED quality, safety, and efficiency. She is a consultant with Quality Matters Consulting, and her expertise is in ED operations.

View this author's posts »

One Response to “Does a 10-Item Physical Exam Add Value to Patient Care?”

  1. November 25, 2014

    The Land of Protocols - LITFL Reply

    […] A recent article in ACEP Now provides a particularly pernicious set of recommendations that explicitly and implicitly would lead to avoidance of much of the physical exam (only 10% yield in diagnoses – ignoring the much lower yields in ACS rule-outs and CT PE studies in low yield patients), deceiving our patients as we knowingly performing useless bedside maneuvers for show, and fabricating medical records for billing purposes. It’s one of the most disturbing articles I’ve read recently. […]

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603