Logo

Latest News

  • Legal Access to Marijuana Tied to Drop in Opioid Prescriptions
  • NOAC Bleeding No More Dangerous than Warfarin Bleeding
Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Practice Management
    • Benchmarking
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Care Team
    • Legal
    • Operations
    • Quality & Safety
  • Public Policy
    • Advocacy
    • Health Reform
    • Medicare & Medicaid
    • Regulation
  • Career
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Technology
    • EMR
    • Health IT
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Innovation
  • Columns
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • EM Docs on Social Media
    • End of the Rainbow
    • The Feed
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Myths in Emergency Medicine
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
      • Roundtable
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Tricks of the Trade
    • Wellness
    • What I Wish I Knew
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
    • Multimedia
    • Events
    • Annals of Emergency Medicene
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
    • EM Career Central
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor-in-Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Authors
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Quick-Wee an Easier Way to Get Infant’s Clean Catch Urine Sample

By Ken Milne, MD | on December 12, 2017 | 0 Comment
Skeptics' Guide to EM
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
Emergency Physicians, Emergency Department, Patient Care, Emergency Medicine, Pediatrics, Urine Sample, Testing
Quick-Wee voiding stimulation method of gentle cutaneous suprapubic stimulation using gauze soaked in cold fluid.

The Case

The emergency department is getting busier with the after-work and after-school crowds. The next patient is a 5-month-old boy brought in by his parents because of a fever. The fever started that morning, and they kept him home from day care. The infant is immunized, looks well, and is drinking fluids in the department. Your examination does not indicate a source of infection. A urinary tract infection (UTI) is a possibility, but you know it could take a long time to get a noninvasive urine sample. In addition, bagged samples can often be falsely positive, and then you would need to get a urine sample using an invasive method such as a catheter. Could there be a way to increase the chance of getting a clean catch urine in fewer than five minutes?

Background

Urine samples are frequently required to rule in or rule out UTIs in children presenting to the emergency department with vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, and/or nonspecific illnesses.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) states that the diagnosis of a UTI requires a urinalysis and a urine culture. This comes from its 2016 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of UTIs that reaffirmed earlier recommendations.1

There are many reasons to rule in or rule out UTIs in children. These include the fact that missed UTIs can result in renal scarring and other pathology, appropriate antibiotic stewardship, and the avoidance of expensive and unnecessary imaging studies.

The AAP strongly recommends an invasive urine sample if the child looks unwell and requires antimicrobial therapy. The urine sample can be obtained with a suprapubic aspiration or urethral catheterization. Obtaining an invasive sample is a clinical decision.

The AAP also makes a strong recommendation that if the clinician determines that the febrile infant has a low likelihood of a UTI, then no urine testing is necessary as long as there is close clinical follow-up.

If the infant does not have a low likelihood of having a UTI but looks well, the AAP recommends two options: obtain the urine sample using one of the invasive method mentioned previously, or use a two-step approach to identify a UTI. The first step is to obtain a urine sample using a noninvasive method such as a bagged urine specimen. If the sample shows no evidence of a UTI, then cultures may be omitted. If the bagged sample shows evidence of a UTI, then the second step is to use an invasive method and perform a urine culture.

Clinical Question

In infants suspected of having a UTI, does the Quick-Wee method increase the success rate of getting a clean catch urine?

Pages: 1 2 3 Single Page

Topics: Emergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysiciansPatient CarePediatricsTestingUrine Sample

Related

  • Opinion: Did Obamacare Reduce ER Use?

    April 17, 2018 - 0 Comment
  • Do Hallway and Other Non-Private Exams Negatively Affect Patient Encounters?

    April 17, 2018 - 0 Comment
  • How to Spot and Help Human Trafficking Victims in the Emergency Department

    April 13, 2018 - 0 Comment

Most Popular

  • 2017–2018 Compensation Report for Emergency Physicians Shows Steady Salaries

  • Ambulance Lights and Sirens Should Only Be Used When the Benefit Outweighs the Risks

  • 10 Tips for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access

About the Author

Ken Milne, MD

Ken Milne, MD, is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Quick-Wee an Easier Way to Get Infant’s Clean Catch Urine Sample”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Current Issue

ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 04 – April 2018

Download PDF

Read More

More from this issue

  • Opinion: We Have Effective Treatments for Opioid Addiction—Why Don’t We Use Them?

  • ILLUSTRATION: Chris Whissen & shutterstock.com

    Chasing Markets Can Be a Poor Long-Term Investment Strategy

  • Photos: Dr. Gerad Troutman

    Disaster Response Journal of Emergency Response to Hurricane Harvey

  • PHOTOS: Leon Haley, lynne Richardson, and Marcus Martin

    Three Emergency Medicine Icons Offer Advice for Overcoming Diversity and Inclusion Challenges

  • Opinion: Authors Respond to Comments on Using Benzodiazepines for Hyperthermia

  • shutterstock.com

    Are Opioids for Sickle Cell Disease Appropriate, or Do They Enable Addiction?

  • ACEP Leadership Addresses Opioid Crisis, Mass Shootings, and Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act

  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Emergency Department Management of Patients Needing Reperfusion Therapy for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

  • Figure 1. Measure the skull thickness on CT to set stopper depth on the Integra skull trephination kit with adjustable stopper.

    How To Perform an Emergency Burr Hole Procedure

  • Coding Wizard

    Billing for Directing EMS Providers in the Field

  • ACEP Past President Dr. Linda Lawrence Elected to NCCPA Board

  • Identify and Treat Lisfranc Injuries

  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • 2017–2018 Compensation Report for Emergency Physicians Shows Steady Salaries

  • Ambulance Lights and Sirens Should Only Be Used When the Benefit Outweighs the Risks

  • 10 Tips for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access

  • Opinion: Did Obamacare Reduce ER Use?

    April 17, 2018 - 0 Comment
  • ACOEP Appoints Board President, New President Elect

    April 17, 2018 - 0 Comment
  • Do Hallway and Other Non-Private Exams Negatively Affect Patient Encounters?

    April 17, 2018 - 0 Comment
  • Return ED Visits: Poor Performance or Flawed Metric?

    Thank you Dr. Wolford, for your suggestion and use of ED return...
    April 13, 2018 - James Augustine, MD, FACEP
  • Recommendations Issued for Use of Thoracotomy in the Emergency Department

    […] ACEP Recommendations for Use of Thoracotomy in...
    April 12, 2018 - Nov 2017 Asynchronous Learning – Lakeland Health EM Blog
  • ACEP Board Approves tPA Clinical Policy

    […] The American College of Emergency Physicians in 2015 did...
    April 10, 2018 - Podcast #90 - Indefinite Evidence and Biased Reporting « FOAM EMS

Polls

With regard to state legislative activity regulating the opioid prescribing practices of emergency physicians, which of the following wouId you support? Check all that apply.

  • Restrictions on duration (36%, 229 Votes)
  • Restrictions of quantity (34%, 219 Votes)
  • Mandatory checking of prescription drug monitoring systems for all opioid prescriptions from the ED (30%, 194 Votes)

Total Voters: 367

Polls results not statistically significant.
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
© 2018. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2333-2603
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.